User talk:Powersmith98

This is Powersmith98's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wolfgang Liedtke (April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Written like a résumé/CV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wolfgang Liedtke and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wolfgang Liedtke, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Numberguy6 (talk) 00:40, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Powersmith98! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Numberguy6 (talk) 00:40, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wolfgang Liedtke (April 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gusfriend were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The Linkedin reference is a primary source and not suitable and needs to be replaced. Also you should not use more than 2-3 citations per item.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wolfgang Liedtke and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wolfgang Liedtke, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 09:43, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Wolfgang Liedtke

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Wolfgang Liedtke, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 05:23, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion by User:Itcouldbepossible

User:Itcouldbepossible

Sorry, I'm not sure if I'm doing this properly. I wrote a short Wiki about a scientist, Wolfgang Liedtke. It is my intention to write pages of various modern living scientists who have been impactful. For the first one, I choice Wolfgang Liedtke because I think he has done important work on understanding pain.

I modeled it after an existing page for another scientist Wiki page, almost exactly, except that I left out a controversies section because I do not know of any. The first draft was declined for being too promotional. I agree it did sound too positive; so I rewrote it to be just the facts.

I submitted a second draft stripped down, just the facts. The feedback for the second draft did not say anything about promotion anymore. Great! It had two new feedback items: (1) Remove LinkedIn as reference. This makes sense, I removed it. In so doing, I eliminated a number of things about the subject person that I had only seen on LinkedIn. (2) Do not list more than 3 refs per item. I reduced to 1-3 refs per item.

I then submitted the third draft yesterday. The third draft was tagged for rapid deletion (G11 promotion of person). I am very confused by this. I referred to other Wiki's about people for example, and I don't see how what I wrote was different from existing pages.

I hope to be able to contribute pages about many scientists in the coming years as there is really not great public resources for learning about any that are not famous in public media. I take the feedback very seriously, and I'm kind of at a loss what I could have done differently, except tried to find some dirt on the subject to include (?). I found the page deleted before I could click on anything. I believe this is some kind of misunderstanding... I would like to have the opportunity to contribute to Wiki with articles about living scientists. What can I do about this?

Sincerely, user: Powersmith98