User talk:Pr4ever/Archives/2011/March
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Association of Naval Service Officers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Association of Naval Service Officers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ScottyBerg (talk) 18:08, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Thank you
Even though I am not as active in Wikipedia as I would like to be due to computer problems, I would like to thank you for always being there for me. Tony the Marine (talk) 00:18, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
AGF
Posts like this[1], which impugn the motives of other Wikipedians, can be construed as a personal attack. Please assume good faith. Thanks, ScottyBerg (talk) 19:28, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Credibility
Since you have made extensive edits to the article of Kenneth McClintock, I believe that it would be to your best interest to know that the credibility of his legal knowledge in regard to the laws which govern public domain images, is being questioned and discussed here. Antonio Martin (talk) 00:25, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
- I would suggest that whoever requested the opinion from MacClintock, I presume your father was the one who contacted him, raise the issue once again and explain exactly what is needed to determine use by Wikipedia. You may want to ask those who are questioning the use of material owned by the Government of PR to hold off from deletion until that consultation is complete. Other than that, I don't know what else to suggest. Pr4ever (talk) 01:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)