User talk:Pramodpotti

Welcome!

Hello, Pramodpotti, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! - Fayenatic (talk) 18:45, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Beta Group and Rajmohan Pillai[edit]

Thank you for disclosing at Talk:Rajmohan Pillai that you "have been interacting with the Beta Group for the last 6 months". As you have continued to edit the article after being notified of Wikipedia's policy WP:Conflict of interest, please would you disclose the nature of your interactions with that Group? - Fayenatic (talk) 17:24, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've been interacting with the group for the last 6 months with regards to business dealings from another company. I've interacted with Dr. Pillai and his team over the period and I strongly believe that with regards to the good work that he has done to the society, the point regarding the legal case is insignificant, harmful and incorrect in its stated form. The following are some of the arguments and I'm working towards providing Wikipedia citations towards the same effect.

The conviction by the lower court has been stayed by high court on the same day, and till the time the high court doesn't take a hearing on the matter, there is no conviction. (references would be given to this effect).
For this one case against Dr. Pillai, there are a few others that have been concluded and where he won the court case against the Government.(references would be provided w.r.t. the case numbers). These could be added to the profile with citations and case numbers. However, this would make the profile look more biased to the legal aspects.
There is a delay in settlement of legal cases in India (references would be given to this effect)
Dr. Pillai over the period has created many jobs and given support to many entrepreneurs. However, since he's a strategist and player behind the scenes, he has avoided the press where possible and there are limited articles to this effect. It is however, hurting the sentiments of our region. This reasoning is not from a neutral point of view.

However, I would like to give you the argument by taking an extreme case of revolutionary Indian freedom fighter, Bhagat Singh. There were many articles talking of him as a revolutionary "terrorist" [1] . However, Indians consider him a one of the most influential freedom fighters & martyr, and it would deeply hurt our sentiments to even accept such a point of view and Wiki has taken note of the fact and not included the same in the main page though certain references are added to this effect.

Hence, I request you to invoke the 5th guiding principle of Wikipedia, [2] , to delete this section in the view of the above reasons. Citations would be provided.

As you advised, I've created an article on New Age International University

There were certain errors I committed since I was new to Wikipedia and I apologize for the same. Further changes would be made once the discussions reach a conclusion in the discussion forum - 18:40, 30 July 2011 (UTC) Pramodpotti (talk) 18:40, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Please see my reply at Talk:Rajmohan Pillai. - Fayenatic (talk) 06:02, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see a further reply at Talk:Rajmohan Pillai. - Fayenatic (talk) 10:29, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And again. - Fayenatic (talk) 16:40, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Same again, a few days ago - Fayenatic (talk) 20:24, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of New Age International University for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Age International University is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Age International University until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 22:57, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]