User talk:PrimeWordsWorld

Welcome!

Hello, Compassites-Software, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 11:55, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Compassites-Software", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because we have a policy against usernames that give off the impression that the account represents a group or organization. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 11:54, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Compassites Software

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Compassites Software, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mean as custard (talk) 16:12, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Hello, PrimeWordsWorld. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 18:08, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Compassites Software for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Compassites Software is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Compassites Software until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dom from Paris (talk) 15:13, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 15:40, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PrimeWordsWorld (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was trying to post an article with decent words honoring the policies of Wikipedia, but unfortunately it has been considered as an act of advertisement or promotion. Here no words or sentences were being used which are tend to be violated. Please reconsider my thoughts and unblock our page. PrimeWordsWorld (talk) 06:54, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It is hard to understand what you are saying. You seem to be claiming you did not violate WP:PROMO. If that's what you believe then you lack sufficient competence to edit here. Additionally, you say "our" which implies this is a shared account. Shared accounts are not permitted here. Alternatively, maybe you mean you were writing about your company. If so, you've also been violating WP:COI. Regardless, we definitely need to leave you blocked. Yamla (talk) 10:47, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PrimeWordsWorld (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I seriously don't know why my article got deleted and then the account got blocked indefinitely. Actually, I have taken precaution in all the possible ways to adhere to the policies of Wikipedia. Probably few of my words were sounding promotional, I'm not sure though. So I will go through it and rewrite that article. Hence please unblock my account and give me a chance to rewrite my contribution. PrimeWordsWorld (talk) 05:29, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you don't know why your article was deleted, you should not be editing Wikipedia. To be unblocked, you must demonstrate that you understand why the article was deleted. Please read through the links to Wikipedia policies and guidelines that have been posted on your talk page. You also haven't told us why you said "our page". Are multiple people using this account? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:05, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PrimeWordsWorld (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that my article got deleted because of some promotional matters as claimed by a wiki administrator. But promotion was not the intent though at any cost. Then, I used the word 'our' because this article page is about an organisation. Please unblock my account and give me a chance to rewrite this article. PrimeWordsWorld (talk) 07:08, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have violated WP:PROMO, WP:COI and WP:PAID, and still don't seem to understand why what you did is considered promotional here. You won't be permitted to continue to write about your employer or anything related to your conflict of interest(COI). To be unblocked, you will need to agree to not edit about your employer and tell what subjects you will edit about instead as an independent, general contributor. I will give you one more chance to do that, if you make an unacceptable unblock request again, you may lose the ability to edit this page too. 331dot (talk) 07:40, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|reason=I Have understood now what exactly went wrong. So, I will continue as general contributor and won't create any article further which violates wiki policy. Please unblock my account and give me a chance to be an independent contributor. [[User:PrimeWordsWorld|PrimeWordsWorld]] ([[User talk:PrimeWordsWorld#top|talk]]) 09:05, 1 August 2019 (UTC)}}

I have struck out your unblock request because it obviously had zero chance of being accepted, and 331dot warned you that you would lose access to this page if you made another pointless unblock request. So, one final chance. Convince us you understand WP:PROMO, WP:COI, and WP:PAID. Explicitly state that you won't edit about your employer. Explicitly state what you'll write about instead. --Yamla (talk) 12:58, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PrimeWordsWorld (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm clearly stating now that I have understood the terms with respect to Promo, COI and Paid policies of Wiki. Anymore, I will not edit any article about my employer here. I will contribute on general topics like Travel places, Marketing and Science as I did earlier. PrimeWordsWorld (talk) 05:17, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Stating that you understand something is not the same as demonstrating that you understand something. What, in your own words, do these policies say, and why were your previous edits in violation of those policies? Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:34, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.