User talk:Primuszm

Primuszm, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Primuszm! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! ChamithN (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:26, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Grudge

Why is it that you Telugu people accuse me of manipulating Andhra-related articles because I'm not a native of Andhra? I'm asking you this because User:Padmalakshmisx accused me of the same through one of his socks. I'll tell you honestly, I have no grudge against Andhra Pradesh or its culture. It is only improperly maintained articles and egoistic users (like Padmalakshmisx) who I cannot tolerate. In N. T. Rama Rao filmography, I removed the "Heroine" column because it is trivial and unacceptable in filmographies; see Portal:Bollywood and check the FL filmographies there. Their "FL" status means that they have been assessed as among "the best lists in Wikipedia". And I don't see any of them having a "Heroine" column. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:50, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

There is no global rule for anything. Hollywood is different. Bollywood is different. European, chinese,... films are different. Tollywood is different. Within Telugu films itself, there is light years difference between shitty films of today and the films of the classic era. You are not a telugu person, so you wouldn't know. So, does that mean every telugu person knows the value of films of classic era (1950-1970)? Obviously No. Since two generations have passed, most of them today wouldn't know. But there are a very few who know stuff. I being one of the people who did research on the classic era. I have watched almost 300 films films of that era. I know that, actress names have no place in filmographies in every movie industry (including telugu industry of today). But its not the same for the classic era. Lead actor, actress, director are most crucial for these movies. Most importantly, the list can be sorted based on the actresses alone. I myself used this page several times to watch movies based on the actress. That information helps in so many ways for all the viewers of this page. That's why, in the research of classic era, we always include actress name. The original source, compiled by Ravikiran, has the actress name in it. I myself have extensive knowledge in this, having read some books on those films. There have been so many Television programs on the number of films of N.T.R with so & so heroines. Without this, people wouldn't know. There are 300 films in the list. I wouldn't have to open each movie page to see 'who the actress is' when its already mentioned in the article.

For a person like you who does edits on most topics on wiki, will obviously have low to no knowledge on a particular. For me, its different, because i know on this topic very well. Again, there is no global rule for everything. The value/importance varies. The very mention of actress in filmographies is useless in bollywood, hollywood, even tollywood of today. But its not the same for Telugu films of classic era AND especially of N.T.R who has done 300 films & out of them, some 100 films carry great value. There are many scholars today researching on his films (including people from the film industry). We did spend a great deal of our time (years) on this. When something carries great importance, it should obviously be included. Leave this stuff to us. Primuszm (talk) 16:36, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Primuszm. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NTRin1952.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NTRin1952.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:57, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Uma chandi gowri shankarula katha.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Uma chandi gowri shankarula katha.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Valmiki 1963.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Valmiki 1963.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Thodu Dongalu.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thodu Dongalu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 2 November 2020 (UTC)