User talk:Princessdiaries11

Stefan Faison is not in Nancy Drew. Max Theriot is playing that part. The IMDB page is labeled "Sade Faison" but has no credits listed. Nothing here but lies. Fan-1967 22:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles, as you did with Stefan Faison. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 23:11, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since the article was deleted through the Articles for Deletion process, it may only be recreated by a Deletion Review, and that would require hard, solid Verification from Reliable Sources. -- Fan-1967 23:13, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Nancy Drew (film)[edit]

Do not add your claims to the Nancy Drew article unless you can provide Reliable Sources to Verify that it is true. If you can't verify it, we don't print it. Those are firm rules. Fan-1967 23:32, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Nancy Drew (film), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fan-1967 23:40, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your latest try[edit]

You added a link to the resume page that has clearly at the bottom "IMDb is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this page, which have been supplied by a third party and have not been screened or verified." In other words, not a reliable source. Give up. IMDB will let you post things without verifying them. We won't. Fan-1967 00:48, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning[edit]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Nancy Drew (film), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fan-1967 01:48, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of repeated vandalism to Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Hús ö nd 02:17, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Princessdiaries11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Princessdiaries11 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

...

Blocking administrator: not provided.

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.