Jump to content

User talk:Princessruby

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gigi Hadid

[edit]

Hi Princessruby, great work on your Gigi Hadid article. I was impressed she even had an article, and was ecstatic to see it so well developed. Keep it up :). Pear285 pear 10:52, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx for the lovely compliment mate. At least someone liked my article. :)--Princessruby (talk) 16:47, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nathan Sykes (singer) has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nathan Sykes (singer). Thanks! Onel5969 (talk) 22:38, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nathan Sykes (singer) has been accepted

[edit]
Nathan Sykes (singer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 (talk) 03:37, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alexander Bruszt has been accepted

[edit]
Alexander Bruszt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 05:16, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vivian Jovanni has been accepted

[edit]
Vivian Jovanni, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 05:31, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kyler Pettis has been accepted

[edit]
Kyler Pettis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 04:54, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Olivia Rose Keegan has been accepted

[edit]
Olivia Rose Keegan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 05:42, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Casey Moss has been accepted

[edit]
Casey Moss, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 05:14, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marci Miller has been accepted

[edit]
Marci Miller, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 06:53, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Princessruby. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gabrielle Haugh has been accepted

[edit]
Gabrielle Haugh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 21:53, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Princessruby. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Victoria Konefal has been accepted

[edit]
Victoria Konefal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:42, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dheeraj Sarna has been accepted

[edit]
Dheeraj Sarna, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 samee  converse  12:10, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are really doing great , and Wikipedia needs more person like you

[edit]

Hello princessruby , I am the creator of the page Anand Ahuja and I am really really impressed with the way you think and the kind of work you are doing to make Wikipedia a Better place, I have seen many insensitive people who are either editors or admins who without thinking or looking missuses the power over here and blocks or apply afd to any newly created articles , I Whole heartily thank you and want to see you as one of the admin, we need good people to make this place really good , Thank You :) HeyLetgoletgo (talk) 18:25, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to second this comment. Your changes certainly gave the article a better chance of surviving AFD, the early version was easily a PROD delete. Ultimately it they just didn't have enough notability independent of their fiance. It makes sense - someone gets engaged to a fairly well-known personality and the gossip columns go crazy. Thank you for your efforts in taking a sub-par article to a state that at least gave it a chance. Ravensfire (talk) 17:38, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I tried but sadly it still got deleted. Thank you anyway. :) Hmm can't avoid the fact that he only got noticed cause of Sonam, but then again ... there were some articles which were only about Anand which m surprised nobody bothered to notice. Yeah I comprehend.  :)--Princessruby (talk) 18:57, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Editor's Barnstar
You deserve more of these badges 😇 HeyLetgoletgo (talk) 19:30, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Resha Konkar has been accepted

[edit]
Resha Konkar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

joe deckertalk 14:29, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Princessruby. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Xander Kiriakis has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Xander Kiriakis. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:09, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Xander Kiriakis has been accepted

[edit]
Xander Kiriakis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:10, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for Deletion

[edit]

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xander Kiriakis. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:58, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chris Hughes (model) has been accepted

[edit]
Chris Hughes (model), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sceptre (talk) 00:11, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

[edit]

Could u please get back the guest appearances for Hina Khan, Dipika Kakar, Sanaya Irani and Karishma Tanna please User:Princessruby some Shukla fan thought he would be smart. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4C8:62:2038:551C:2DC3:1805:C1FC (talk) 13:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Least developed countries

[edit]

Please read the article before you remove countries that are classified by the UN Economic and Social Council as Least developed countries (LDC). There is a process by which countries are classified as LDC, and there is a process to "graduate" them. The UN l lists these countries on their website: https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/least-developed-country-category/ldcs-at-a-glance.html and as you can see Nepal, Benin and Tanzania are on the list. That may change in the future, but as the section Declassification explains, a country is not taken off the list as soon as it meets the criteria for graduation. As it stands you have removed countries that are classified as LDC and I ask that you self-revert (including the change of Americas to America since America redirects to United States. Sjö (talk) 13:04, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for the kind explanation. Ive understood ur point now, but the article u shared is an old article which was posted in 2018. How about referring to the new article which actually mentions about the country no longer become a low income country. https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/new-world-bank-country-classifications-income-level-2020-2021

--Princessruby (talk) 13:18, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Those are not mutually exclusive. A country can cease to be a low income country and still be an LDC. As I explained, declassification takes time and the criteria for inclusion in the LDC category is different from criteria for other classifications. Thing is this article is about a specific list maintained by an organization within the UN, so it doesn't matter if a country is or is not in some other category or some other list.
The list I linked to is the current list, as you can see here (search for "There are currently 47 countries on the list of LDCs"). The fact sheets are from 2018 because the last time a country graduated was in 2017, as you can see here.
So one might think that it's wrong that this or that country is on the list, but that doesn't change that the countries I mentioned are on the list, and that it is well sourced that they are. Sjö (talk) 13:36, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

[edit]

Information icon Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. livelikemusic (TALK!) 13:52, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mbezi Luis Bus Terminal has been accepted

[edit]
Mbezi Luis Bus Terminal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 14:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Baby-R (April 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 08:34, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Princessruby! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 08:34, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paige Larson for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paige Larson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paige Larson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:44, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Baby-R

[edit]

Hello, Princessruby. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Baby-R".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:32, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mail

[edit]
Hello, Princessruby. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

IAmAtHome (talk) 05:47, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Apaugasma. I noticed that you recently removed content from Umm Kulthum bint Ali without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 14:17, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Apaugasma. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Zayd ibn Umar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Same goes for the related changes at Umar. All we need is a reliable source. Thanks! ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 14:20, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Start using edit summaries

[edit]

You have been around long enough to know that you need to explain your edits and shouldn't be blanking content without 1.) an obvious reason and 2.) an explanation as to why. Further, you need to communicate with editors leaving concerns on your talk page, especially given your history and block log. PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:21, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to second this call for you to explain your edits in the edit summary. From Help:Edit summary:

Summaries help other editors by (a) providing a reason for the edit, (b) saving the time to open up the edit to find out what it's all about, and (c) providing information about the edit on diff pages and lists of changes (such as page histories and watchlists). The Wikipedia community strongly encourages editors to provide meaningful edit summaries.

This fellow editor would appreciate your cooperation in this. Thank you. — Archer1234 (t·c) 06:13, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Baby-R

[edit]

Hello, Princessruby. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Baby-R".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:55, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Princessruby/Ronnie Murchinson

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Princessruby. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Princessruby/Ronnie Murchinson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DADASAHEB and MOS:FILMCRITICLIST

[edit]

Hi please see WP:DADASAHEB also Awards included in lists should have a Wikipedia article to demonstrate notability per MOS:FILMCRITICLIST Sid95Q (talk) 01:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, but do not delete the entire 2024 award section.

Thanks. --Princessruby (talk) 06:12, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As mentioned above awards should a Wikipedia page to demonstrate notability. The other unsourced award you are adding doesn't have one. Sid95Q (talk) 06:22, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Samarth Jurel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prem Bandhan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:11, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Samarth Jurel for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samarth Jurel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samarth Jurel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Your draft article, Draft:Princessruby/Ronnie Murchinson

[edit]

Hello, Princessruby. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ronnie Murchinson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:04, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Princessruby&oldid=1238013069"