User talk:Profberger/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
A welcome
For your information, the discussion regarding your article has been closed as a 'keep' - thank you for weighing in and explaining the changes you had made. I'm sure Wikipedia will benefit from your knowledge.
As it appears nobody has left this for you yet:
|
- I've cleared up the AFD tag for you - the fellow who closed the discussion forgot to remove it. Cheers! Tony Fox (arf!) review? 04:49, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Clarke
Thanks for the correction. I was working quickly with the immediately available material, so I may well have made errors. As there seems to be some dispute over the importance of his work, it would probably be best to expand the discussion in the article with the pertinent refs, saying who did what. Thanks, DGG 05:12, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Barnstar!
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| Given in recognition for the work done by you on Makuleke article. keep up the editing :) JWJW Talk Long Live Esperanza! :) 09:55, 28 July 2007 (UTC) |
Nautilus
I must say I was very happy to see your Nautilus images when I logged on last night! N. belauensis is quite a rarity due to its restricted range and there are few images of it online. I would certainly be interested in seeing any other Nautilus images. If you plan to upload images under a free license then please consider using Wikimedia Commons. Images uploaded to Commons can be used by all language Wikipedias as well as other Wikimedia projects. Regards, Mgiganteus1 05:26, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- Images released under a free license can be used by anyone. However, technical limitations mean that images uploaded to the English Wikipedia can only be used on the English Wikipedia. Mgiganteus1 05:37, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Makuleke
Hi Profberger. You are off to such a great start on the article Makuleke that it may qualify to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page under the Did you know... section. The Main Page gets about 4,000,000 hits per day and appearing on the Main Page may help bring publicity and assistance to the article. However, there is a five day from article creation window for Did you know... nominations. Before five days pass from the date the article was created and if you haven't already done so, please consider nominating the article to appear on the Main Page by posting a nomination at Did you know suggestions. If you do nominate the article for DYK, please cross out the article name on the "Good" articles proposed by bot list. Also, don't forget to keep checking back at Did you know suggestions for comments regarding your nomination. Again, great job on the article. -- Jreferee (Talk) 01:33, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
|
On August 2, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Makuleke, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Excellent. Well done, very comprehensive and thankyou Professor Berger for sharing your research and expertise with us. Have a good day and happy editing, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 01:42, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
About being your own source.
This policy is probably what you want. Generally, citing yourself is OK as long as you aren't trying to use it to win a content dispute (for example, if I say the earth revolves around the moon, and you say the moon revolves around the earth, even if you're an astronomer, using your own experience would be highly inappropriate, and such things have caused Wikipedia trouble in the past), you aren't trying to boost your own appeal (get more people to buy your books, follow your opinion, or in other ways advertise), and you aren't soapboxing (for example, a Geologist using his obvious experience to support evolution in favor of creationism) From what I've seen, your sources are very non-controversial, but informative, and will almost certainly be appreciated here on Wikipedia, as long as you stick to the above rules.
That said, welcome to Wikipedia! We hope you enjoy it here, and feel free to ask us, the WP:N? or WP:HD boards. As a suggestion, you might also be interested in one of our sister projects, Wikibooks. Their goal is to create entirely readable and educational books, and that seems like something you're experienced with ^^
- Ok, I actually read through Makuleke, and I have a couple suggestions. While the article is written very well, and is interesting, some parts of it show the 'bookiness' of it, instead of the encyclopedia we strive to me. For example, we try to avoid using words like "One" and "you". I'll list some examples below.
| What it says | What would be Better |
|---|---|
| (The other interesting facts) | Most of these would probably be better off in the article on Limpopo or the Limpopo River |
| ...Ancient, and Dying...Young, and Powerful... | These are probably not needed at all. They do not sound entirely appropriate for an encyclopedia. |
| The landscape itself is ancient. The rocks in the area reach back over 250 million years recording at their base the greatest extinction event the planet has ever seen, an event heralding the end of the Palaeozoic and the beginning of the Mesozoic – the age of the dinosaurs. This extinction is known as the Permian extinction and well over 80% of all species on the planet vanished – a tragedy for some but an opportunity for others. | Some rocks in the area reach back over 250 million years, and have records of the Permian extinction. |
- Now, to be quite honest, I prefer your style, but it's not really how Wikipedia is written, as that style of writing tends to lend itself to supporting points of view. Some things are just longer than they need to be, like the information about the Paleozoic and Mesozoic time periods, while useful in a book, are not so useful on Wikipedia when you can just say "The rocks record the Permian extinction", and they can click on the link to find out more. I can make these sorts of changes to the article for you if you want, and then you can just proofread them to make sure they're factually accurate, or you can try to make them yourself, and then I can cleanup anything you miss.
- P.S. - Remember, Perfection comes not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing more to take away --Longing.... 20:00, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
No problem. I'll have to put this off till tomorrow though, my typing accuracy falls off like cars on a collapsing bridge (what, too soon?) when I'm sleepy. This might seem like a bit of a random request, but if you happen to know anything about Kowlian, Afghanistan, or a source that has information on it, could you put it in that article, or at least put it on the talk page there? I'd like to have more than "It's a place." I realize you're a completely different part of the world than it is, but I figure hey, you might have a reference or something that I didn't try out that could be useful. --L--- 05:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Copyright on Makuleke
I note that much of this article appears to be copied from ref 2. I'm working under the assumption that you are actually the author of that webpage; however, I believe a formal statement of copyright release will still be required from you. I've therefore listed the page at Wikipedia:Copyright problems, so that they can inform you how to go about formally releasing the copyright. Espresso Addict 00:21, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, keep in mind that any contribution you make to Wikipedia must be made under WP:GFDL, or in the public domain. You cannot use copyrighted text verbatim. If you wish to release the content into the public domain or GFDL, you must make a comment *on that (external) page* that specifically states that you do. --Longing.... 00:59, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks! I'm not an expert in free licensing, but I believe that you need only include a link to the license terms under which you are releasing the material. Regards, Espresso Addict 12:21, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for that source about fighting in Kowlian, even "it has been the source of fighting" is better than just "It's a place". --L-- 14:42, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading images/media such as Image:Kromdraai B.jpg to Wikipedia! There is however another Wikimedia foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In the future, please consider creating an account and uploading media there instead. That way, all the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons. Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading!
Sfan00 IMG 19:13, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Re:Thanks
sorry for not replying quicker, (i was in a different part of the country far away from my PC-bristol in fact) yes I am interested in the contributions you have made, and i think i will keep track of the articles that you submit. anyway, happy editing.--JWJW Talk Long Live Esperanza! :)/Stronger Faster Better. 23:25, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Lee, I'm publishing a sequel to Jules Verne's 20,000 Leagues under the Seas and I'd like to use your wonderful photo on the book cover, if that use is covered by the Attribution 2 licence you gave it. Could you confirm that? I'd also like to send you a copy of the book when it is published. Please e-mail me from my Talk page and give me your address. -- Evertype·✆ 23:12, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:Hoedjiespunt1.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hoedjiespunt1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Nv8200p talk 01:31, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Images should preferably be uploaded at Commons
Thank you for uploading images/media to Wikipedia! There is, however, another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In future, please upload media there instead (see m:Help:Unified login). That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons (you may view images you have previously uploaded by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'image' namespace from the drop down box). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading! Richard001 (talk) 08:11, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
NowCommons: Image:Cheetah and thomy.jpg
Image:Cheetah and thomy.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Cheetah chasing Thompsons gazelle.jpg. Commons is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image(s) will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Cheetah chasing Thompsons gazelle.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:16, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Image:Leopard rear view.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Leopard rear view.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Leopard rear view.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:58, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
NowCommons: File:Scrub hare.jpg
File:Scrub hare.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Scrub hare (Lepus saxatilis).jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Scrub hare (Lepus saxatilis).jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 07:54, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:Nautilus profile.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Nautilus profile.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:46, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Photo usage
Hi, I've been working on a small game built around animal quizzes and I wanted to let you know I've used one of your pictures.
I found your picture here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hemachatus-1.jpg
And I attributed the picture like this: Lee R. Berger with this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/user:Profberger and also added a link to the license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/deed.en
I hope you're happy with it, please let me know if this is not the case. You can find the game here: http://apps.facebook.com/animalalbum Or through here: http://www.facebook.com/pages/AnimalAlbum/156339584490672
Kind regards, Garfunkel Jansen (talk) 08:22, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
P.S. Thanks for taking the picture and making it available.
I use one of your photos
Hi Profberger!
I have use a photo of Leptailurus serval from wikimedia in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia)
You can see directly in the follow link and click over "Siguiente" ("Next"):
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/imagen.php?id=34312
If you wish, you can send me some letters or/and a photo for your "contributor card" in Animalandia:
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Profberger
This is my "contributor card", for example:
http://herramientas.educa.madrid.org/animalandia/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn
In the future, I use more of your photos, I sure!
Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!! Regards! Fernando Lisón
--Fernando.lison (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:38, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Dear Lee, Thank you for your notes on the cave. The first thing I should bring to your attention is that I am an editor of the article, but not the only editor. Wikipedia frowns on ownership of articles.
- The inclusion of Pedro Boshoff was done by an editor called Paleo Bonegirl.
- "Lee Berger noted on Facebook that he assembled a skeleton from UW-102 materials.[6]" I perhaps think your using a facebook posting to leap to assembling what is implied as a whole skeleton is perhaps a bit much don't you think? I do indeed think it's a bit much, but if you examine the history of the page you will find that it was editor 68.97.5.247 who added the piece - perhaps it might be a good idea to address him/her with your concern. Did you, in fact, post such a statement on Facebook?
- "The large number of individuals found in a tiny underground chamber, though, invites speculation on the cause. The difficulty of access as well as apparent early age of the site would seem to rule out formal burial; the only possibilities remaining are transport by water from another location, or an attempted escape from a catastrophic surface event. Interestingly, the Tswaing crater, some 200,000 years old, lies only 70km distant." The process by which the remains ended up in the chamber is indeed speculative. The sentence on the Tswaing crater has, as is noted, been added for interest - it is up to the reader to make a connection if he so desires.
- The lack of information forthcoming, though, is not speculative, but very real, and if you would like to add any data to the article, it would be most appreciated. Paul venter (talk) 13:26, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
In response to the new note you posted on my page, I should point out that after your first note I amended the issues which you raised and which I did not consider problematic. Paul venter (talk) 17:30, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Brilliant starling small.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:16, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Another one of your uploads, File:Cooperstools2.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:11, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- Another one of your uploads, File:Coopers1.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:13, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
- Another one of your uploads, File:Coopers meg.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:17, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Requested article
I see wikipedia has nothing like Timeline of discoveries in the Cradle of Humankind, and few persons may have the insight to start it. JMK (talk) 18:22, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Request for permission to use image
Dear Professor Berger, I am a publisher from Namibia. I would like to use your image of a rufous-tailed weaver in our publication of a Natural Science and Health Education Grade 5 Learner's Book. I kindly ask for permission to use your image in this publication. Please contact me via email: malimap@nph.com.na to discuss this further. Thank you. I look forward to hearing from you. Warm regards, Patrycja. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.216.39.190 (talk) 09:15, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
Your voice and ORCID
Hi,
We'd love to add a recording of your voice to the article about you. Also, you can add your ORCID iD to your user page. Wikipedia:ABOUTYOU explains. Cheers, Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:16, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)