User talk:Professor22

November 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. JNW (talk) 21:12, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Also please see WP:SOCKPUPPET re; using multiple accounts. JNW (talk) 21:12, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

I'm logged in as a legitimate user and using a CITED SOURCE...where is this wikipedia violation of "no original research" happening? Is this your own personal opinion because I actually have two sources to use for this. Both are scholarly...

Source from: Mankiw, Gregory (2004) "Principles of Microeconomics" Harvard University. And also: Miller, Roger Leroy (2001) "The Economics of Public Issues" Institute for University Studies in Arlington, Texas.

What else do you want?

Given your apparent access to reliable sources, I'm puzzled that you chose to write an unacceptably biased couple of passages. Wikipedia is not a blog for publishing non-neutral commentary--by so doing, you transformed the sources into original research. Please read WP:NEUTRAL. And yes, you appear to have edited under separate accounts. JNW (talk) 21:30, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

And no, I HAVEN'T edited under separate accounts...this is the only one I'm under. I wouldn't be having this conversation with you if I had already logged into another computer and hid my IP address. Seems silly for something this ridiculous. You're distributing wrong information :(

You need to discuss this at [1] , where I've said You are making an argument presumably sourced from a book, but without page numbers and given the style of the edit, virtually impossible to verify - see WP:VERIFY. It reads like an op ed piece - shorthand, 'our country', 'guy', ALL CAPS, etc. You wouldn't expect to find this in a print encyclopedia and it doesn't belong in this encyclopedia. Just tell us, in more or less formal language, what Mankiw and Miller say about illegal immigration. I've tried to check Mankiw online and can't find anything in his book that mentions illegal immigration other than to say that people tend to focus on it. If they don't specifically discuss illegal immigration, applying anything they say about economics to the subject of illegal immigration is what we call original research, see WP:OR. Dougweller (talk) 21:59, 2 November 2010 (UTC)