User talk:ProfessorWikiGuy

September 2018[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2018 CUOS appointments/OS, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vanamonde (talk) 04:01, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 04:03, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me please[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ProfessorWikiGuy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If I cannot be unblocked, nobody can edit in the public library by the council

Decline reason:

See below. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:23, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That's not true, they, just like you, can create an account. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 04:08, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

True but why do he blocked me for some reason? Because I was trying to fix something but it came as you got new message as a shock! Wikipedia need another way to get unblocked like a timer. --ProfessorWikiGuy (talk) 04:11, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No you weren't. Drmies (talk) 04:11, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
TonyBallioni, DoRD, you reckon this is User:Jenulot? Drmies (talk) 04:11, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Drmies, this is 100% Jenulot. Talk page access revoked. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:18, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks Tony. Yeah, what a waste of electrons. Drmies (talk) 04:19, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Tony, do you mind denying the request and tagging them, or adding them to the SPI? For the record, that was a 100% match from the CU perspective. Drmies (talk) 04:20, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here a example[edit]

61.69.113.146 Is created by me --ProfessorWikiGuy (talk) 04:13, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/61.69.113.146, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 19:04, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]