User talk:Profmwilliams

Peer review example[edit]

Here is an example of a fictitious peer review of a fictitious article that would be considered complete. Notice that the reviewers address each part of criterion 5 of the Wikipedia assignment and make suggestions that incorporate new ideas and the group's planned revisions. The suggestions for meeting each part of criterion 5 are specific in that they give the group a clear sense of how to meet the criteria. The more specific, the better!

The article revisions are on the way to completing all parts of criterion 5 of the Wikipedia assignment. We have explained each part and made suggestions for improvement below:

5a. The group has currently added 200 words to the article, which is 150 words short of the 350-word minimum. On the article talk page, the group said that they plan to add two sections on the history of policing and current issues in policing. It might be better to just add one of these sections and make sure it's 150 words. Otherwise, each section might only be 75 words, which wouldn't be enough to cover each section. (Note that there could also be the opposite problem: if the group had only added 100 words and they wanted to add a very narrow section, then it may not be enough to get them to the 350-word minimum.)

5b. The current revisions focus on the topic, but the section on the legal issues related to policing goes into too much detail. We suggest condensing the two paragraphs about the Supreme Court's reasoning in each case into one broader paragraph.

5c. The current revisions display a little bit of bias in that they focus on one side of the argument that the police are essentially corrupt. In the revisions, focus on adding some information about the side of the argument that says that not all police are corrupt. It could be useful to bring in information about different types of corrupt officers and departments to show that corruption isn't just one-sided.

5d. For the most part, information is correctly referenced. The sentence, "Americans tend to trust the police" needs a source.

5e. The revisions do a good job of summarizing information without bringing in original research. (Note that bringing evidence together in a new way to make an original argument would constitute "original research." As you review your articles, be on the lookout for information that goes beyond summarizing the current literature.)

5f. Most of the revisions are well-written, clear, and concise, follow copyright laws, and include few or no mechanical errors. There is a grammar error in the first sentence of the opening section that needs to be fixed.

5g. The revisions are organized within and between sections and the article seems to flow with the new revisions.

5h. Almost all of the revisions comply with style guidelines. The third section needs to be a sub-section of the second section instead of its own new section.

5i. The revisions so far don't link to other Wikipedia cases. You could link "Rodney King," "Use of force continuum," and "Community policing" to those pages.

5j. So far, the revisions don't include any images. Some ideas for what to add would be images related to protests over the police and/or pictures of officers who have been major players in combating corruption in the U.S.

Grade[edit]

I made revisions to assignment 4Dionnecoe (talk) 18:18, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Profmwilliams, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Education noticeboard, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! TheLongTone (talk) 20:47, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Education noticeboard[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 20:47, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I moved your request to the appropriate place at Wikipedia:Education_noticeboard. Did you do anything unusual with the software? I would not expect to see the software put your request there. I suspect someone changed the software and broke something, and it placed your request in an unusual place. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:49, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for moving it to the correct page. I clicked on the "Request the 'instructor' right" button at the bottom of this page: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:Training/For_educators/Setting_up_your_course_2. Profmwilliams (talk) 21:07, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The

Adventure

Hi Profmwilliams!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by Chris Troutman (talk) 16:21, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 15:41, Monday, May 13, 2024 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Ambassador[edit]

Hi -- I got your note asking if I would be an ambassador for your class this fall. I'm actually already committed to helping another class, but I'd be glad to keep an eye on yours too. However, if you do find someone else willing to be an ambassador, that would be best, in case I am short of time with the two classes. Let me know the name of your course once you've created it. Thanks -- Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 13:42, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message Mike Christie. No one else has responded to my requests for an ambassador, so I would be grateful for your help with the course. The course is called CJ2300 Policing: History, Theory, and Practice.Profmwilliams (talk) 18:19, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK; glad to help where I can. Please let your students know I'd be happy to answer any questions they have. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 14:51, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Students posting from IP addresses[edit]

Hi -- just wanted to let you know that I see some of your students posting their usernames on your course talk page, while editing as IPs. There's nothing wrong with doing this, but I wanted to let you know that this makes it clear which IP address is being used by which student. To some people, that's a privacy concern. In a university environment, of course, the IP is probably just the address of the campus wireless network and doesn't have any association to the student at all, so I don't think it's an issue, but if you get asked about privacy and anonymity I wanted to be sure you were aware of the connection.

I'll keep an eye on the talk page, and I'll watch the articles that the students choose to work on; let me know as the semester goes along if there's anything I can do to help. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 17:58, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. I reminded them in our last class to be sure to sign in when they make edits. I'll keep reminding them until it becomes habit. Profmwilliams (talk) 04:14, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Related changes[edit]

I got your note; thanks for the heads up. Not sure if you already know this, but a good quick way to see what your students are doing is to click on the "Related changes" link in the "Tools" section of the sidebar on the left of your course page. The related changes function shows all recent changes to pages linked from a given page, so if you were to delete links to articles that your students aren't editing, or perhaps create another page with just the links they are editing, you would be able to see recent changes to all of them with a single click. Hope that's useful. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 03:35, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip! I was wondering if there was an easy way to see what they were doing. They have to sign up for pages by October 3, so after that I'll delete the pages they're not working on. Profmwilliams (talk) 16:31, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On the subject of feedback[edit]

You posted to my talk page that I needed to add an internal link to my chosen article. I have done this as requested TheTurf (talk) 18:41, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted everything for the Unit 4 assignments. I think. Bryan Wicker (talk) 02:18, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to assignment[edit]

I went into my talk page and added new section plus the external link that is needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cj2300 (talk • contribs) 17:27, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see the new section on your user page. Perhaps it didn't save or maybe you weren't signed in when you edited your user page. Profmwilliams (talk) 22:40, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Now I see what happened, you added it to the Course talk page rather than your user page. Make sure you're logged in, then go to your user page and complete the same steps as you did before. Profmwilliams (talk) 22:41, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CJ 2300 Reworking/rewriting one of my posts notice[edit]

I just wanted to make a note/leave a message that i am in the process of reworking what i has posted on my topic Prison-industrial complex as it did gete taken down but that it may take some time as i am trying to tackle my other classes/theory paper/exams this weekend. I got a reply back from Collect (talk) about a few ways to fix my post and i will try and work on them this weekend and into next week. Once i find another source i should be able to rewrite and fix my errors but i am a little worried that because it will not be on the topics main page for review by others, as part of the class assignment, that it may hurt the overall grade. If you have any suggestions going forward about what i should focus on to stay on track for class goals/assignments i would appreciate it. Shadowbolt7 (talk) 21:13, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to give you an update that i have put up a new post on my topic but unfortunately part of it has been taken down. I am at this moment in the process of talking with Collect (talk) to try and fix this but i am hesitant of what the outcome of the project will be. I think my writing skills are better at writing opinion pieces than neutral points.

Your experience with Wikipedia so far[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am conducting a quick survey about newcomer support and I would like to hear about your experience so far. Your response will go a long way to help us build a better experience for newcomers like yourself. The survey will take you around 10 minutes to complete.

To learn more about the study, visit this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Co-op

To take the survey, visit this link: https://syracuseuniversity.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_2bnPZz0HelBaY85

Thanks!

Gabrielm199 (talk) 16:24, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]