Jump to content

User talk:Progwa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Progwa (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Ricky81682 has blocked me and said that I am a sockpuppet of PaxEquilibrium. That is a mistake; I am editing from university that uses internal proxy for internet access, and so there must be confusion with someone else out of thousands of people who have access from the PMF Belgrade. My edits do not justify any block and I am certainly not PaxEquilibrium. Please note that all students/staff who might be editing from any of the 100+ computers share the same IP and that your block is affecting completely unrelated people. Progwa (talk) 09:09, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account was created only a few days ago and, whether it is a sock or not is irrelevant since all you used it for was POV-pushing and disruption. It is properly blocked indefinitely. — Daniel Case (talk) 14:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • I have reviewed the few edits you have made before you were blocked, as well as the ones made by PaxEquilibrium (talk · contribs). The matching points of interest, combined with the matching IP address (as verified by Checkuser), has led me to believe that you two are indeed the same person. Request to unblock denied. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 14:06, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]