User talk:ProvisionalMPEP
Welcome
[edit]
|
Hi there, In your recent edit I believe you were conflating the concepts of nihilism and inherent non-existence, but I am willing to listen to your thoughts. Please discuss this with me on the talk page so that we can come to a consensus before making edits to the article. (20040302 (talk) 11:10, 21 December 2011 (UTC))
Unblock
[edit]ProvisionalMPEP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not a sockpuppet of Thigle.
Decline reason:
If the concept of "distinction without a difference" "doesn't make much sense" to you, then we're done. In fact, calling a very detailed and evidence-laden SPI "nonsensical jibberish" pretty much ices the cake. Merry Christmas! — Daniel Case (talk) 19:24, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- The evidence in the SPI is quite compelling, and it says that you are, if not a sockpuppet, than a meatpuppet editing on his behalf. In cases where it's impossible to tell if an editor is an individual editing on behalf of a blocked/banned user or a sockpuppet of same, the editor is put under the same sanctions as the suspected sockmaster. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 17:31, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Well that doesn't make much sense to me. ProvisionalMPEP (talk) 17:55, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- And the so called "evidence" is just nonsensical jibberish. ProvisionalMPEP (talk) 18:09, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
- Well that doesn't make much sense to me. ProvisionalMPEP (talk) 17:55, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
The system is obviously stacked. ProvisionalMPEP (talk) 19:48, 23 December 2011 (UTC)