User talk:Pscorp19

Criticism article

Hey, i don't know how much attention you were paying on Talk:Mail Online, but i've started up User:Jenova20/Criticism of the Daily Mail and Mail Online. It would be useful if you wanted to lend a hand there at all. Currently i just intent to grab some resources to see what i have and what the sources support. There's gonna be lots of work to go around if you're bored and want to chip in. Thanks ツ Jenova 20 ^(email) 15:55, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice effort, I will join in future. Pscorp19 (talk) 13:59, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DRN

There is a Dispute Resolution Noticeboard incident you may want to participate in concerning the Mail Online here. Thanks ツ Jenova 20 ^(email) 15:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Calling other editors "blind" is improper in edit summaries. Collect (talk) 18:27, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning

Please be advised you are now past 3RR at Mail Online and that to avoid any possible admin actions you ought to self-revert your last edit. Cheers. Collect (talk) 18:29, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANEW

You have been reported for failure to self-revert when you were informed you were at 4RR in 20 hours on Mail Online. Please note that 4RR breaks the "bright line" rule on edit warring. Cheers. Collect (talk) 19:10, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ECStudio moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, ECStudio, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 17:52, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

EveryCircuit moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, EveryCircuit, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 17:53, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:ECStudio concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:ECStudio, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:47, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]