User talk:Pub849sp

Hello Pub849sp, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Pub849sp, good luck, and have fun. --SparksBoy (talk) 03:47, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kumul vs. Hami

Please do not make major changes to the naming of articles without discussing it first. Kumul is the native name of the city and there is consensus for using this name. If you believe it should be changed, you are free to start a discussion at Talk:Kumul. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 22:14, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

the official name is Hami City and why did remove the infobox i added?--Pub849sp (talk) 22:17, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, the native name is Kumul. Likewise, the Wikipedia article about Urumqi is not titled "Wulumuqi", Kashgar is not "Kashi", etc.

Like I said, if you disagree, start a discussion at Talk:Kumul. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 22:23, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But why did you delete the infobox?--Pub849sp (talk) 22:24, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What infobox? Please point out which article you're referring to. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 22:25, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kumul. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 22:25, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete the infobox in Hami City?--Pub849sp (talk) 22:26, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here, I have now restored it. The deletion happened by accident while I was trying to undo your other changes. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 22:27, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by native name?? Hami City is the native name, when I travelled there it was by far the most commonly used name by locals. Pub849sp (talk) 22:32, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, in my experience all the Uyghurs I know call it Kumul (قۇمۇل), Uyghur publications use that name, and road signs tend to say 哈密 in Chinese and قۇمۇل in Uyghur. So I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.

But anyway, our personal experience doesn't matter. Like I said, if you want to change the name you can start a discussion at Talk:Kumul. This page is not the appropriate place to make a decision like that; you should start a discussion at the article's talk page so that more editors can discuss. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 22:35, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, some Ughurs i met used the kumul, but the vast majority of locals used 'Hami City'.

e.g. Yumin County is called Yumin, more rarely Qaƣantokay, because Yumin was the name most commonly by people living there. thanks

Other pages

Now I see you're doing this same thing on a bunch of other pages, sinifying non-Chinese names. Again, please do not make massive changes like this without first making a suggestion at a talk page. If you want to make changes across many articles, your best bet is to leave a suggestion at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Chinese) explaining your proposal, and then you can see what other editors have to say. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 02:34, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Those places are where I have visited and those are most common names used by the locals of all ethnic groups.--Pub849sp (talk) 02:48, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also why did you delete my edits?--Pub849sp (talk) 02:56, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, your personal impressions from your personal experiences do not count as reliable sources for this sort of thing. I have already given you ample opportunity to start a discussion in one of the appropriate venues and make your proposal. Please do that instead of edit warring. When you know that there are objections against your editing, it is inappropriate to continue editing in that way without engaging in discussion. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 03:19, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But i dont know why keeping on taking out my editing? Pub849sp (talk) 03:32, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Because you are continuing to make controversial page moves and have not made any attempts to start a discussion at any of the pages I directed you to, I have had no choice but to report you to other administrators. The report is here and you are welcome to comment. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 04:25, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did start a discussion on the talk page.Pub849sp (talk) 04:31, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Most of the local people in this county refer to it as Akesai. thanks" is not a discussion. Stop right now, or I'll block you indefinitely until you acknowledge the concerns. I think people would like a reliable source for that statement and then we can discuss whether the local term or other terms are more in line with the WP:MOS. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 18:36, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]