User talk:Puddink

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your edits to Coupang have been reverted[edit]

Information icon Hello, Puddink. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Coupang, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Please propose changes on the article's talk page. Thanks, Ptrnext (talk) 02:23, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ptrnext. Thanks for your comments.
However, my correction is not for a commercial reason.
It was a request of Coupang Headquarter because previous page has wrong information regarding headquarter address.
...
Please refer to the recent SEC Report addressed below.
https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1834584/000183458423000054/cpng-20230630.htm
...
This is also an updated version of [note 4] - https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1834584/000162828021001984/coupang-sx1.htm
it should be updated as above address of recent SEC Report
...
I hope to you to check this information and restore my editing soon. Thanks :) Puddink (talk) 09:00, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Puddink, thanks for getting back. When you say "It was a request of Coupang Headquarter", it is considered a conflict of interest, and whether you are paid for the edits or not, you are expected to follow the policy and make an edit request on the company's talk page, so other uninvolved editors can consider implementing your changes.
Most of the changes in your edits were not helpful:
  • The first sentence begins with the company name, but you changed it to Seattle-headquartered... Refer to WP:NCCORP for the relevant guideline.
  • Both the lede as well as the infobox already contains the correct headquarters. When we say based in Seattle, Washington, it implies that the company is headquartered in Seattle.
  • You removed the {{lang-ko}} template
  • You added an unnecessary citation to the company's live stock price page. This is not needed, as we already have the {{NYSE}} link to the company's stock in the infobox.
  • You removed that it is a South Korean e-commerce company. Reliable sources continue to describe it as such because besides its founding there, over 90% of its business is from there. The company moved to the US, despite having nearly zero business there, only to get access to better funding prospects including IPO.
  • Your addition operating in Korea and Taiwan to the lede is helpful; but I think you missed including Japan. I can add this part to the article.
Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Ptrnext (talk) 14:50, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pozalabs (September 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 14:15, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pozalabs (October 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 10:15, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Puddink! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 10:15, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pozalabs (November 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]