User talk:AS
uk:user talk:AS
This page is a soft redirect.
Хам
[edit]«Грядущий хам вже навіть не гряде – уже він сам в грядуще нас веде» — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.124.70.37 (talk) 07:27, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
- Куць-куць-куць) --AS sa 07:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
- ціпа-ціпа-ціпа))) --Bulka UA (talk) 13:58, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
- Ох, думав кілька хвилин, до чого це. Ви такий злопам'ятний? --AS sa 15:15, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
- ціпа-ціпа-ціпа))) --Bulka UA (talk) 13:58, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Abecedarians (band)
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Abecedarians (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 08:01, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Re: Page userfication
[edit]All done! - Vianello (Talk) 03:29, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks! --AS sa 10:23, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
[edit]Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:39, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
The article Live Wire (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails on both general notability and music notability guidelines; almost no sources available, the small handful that do exist fail as reliable sources as they are self-published (music blogs etc.)
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:55, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 5
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tymofiy Morokhovets, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rock, Doping and Lifestyle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, AS. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, AS. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, AS. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, AS. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ANI discussion
[edit]I opened an ANI topic, Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Attack on Stepan Bandera, likely externally coordinated, you are welcome to respond there.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:25, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Блокування
[edit]Добрий день. Пишу вам як учаснику обговорення на сторінці перевірки користувачів, бо хочу дати пояснення. Перш за все, я не маю відношення ні до Bodiadub-а, ні до його контори загалом. І платного внеску у мене теж немає, ви це можете перевірити в історії редагувань. Вважаю, що реальною причиною мого блокування і в 2021 році, і зараз, є намагання приховати порушення правил goo3 і замовчати це все. Вперше з його порушеннями я зіткнувся, коли редагував статтю про будинок у Києві (я юрист за освітою, тому звернув увагу на його дії, професійний інтерес все ж таки). У 2021 році в кнайпі я підняв питання про порушення правил адміном goo3. Як на мене, він тоді попросив свого, як я вважаю, знайомого yakudza заблокувати мене, що він і зробив. Цього разу я мав намір номінувати його на позбавлення прав адміністратора, і він знову попросив yakudza мене заблокувати. Я ще думаю, що goo3 проводив приховану ЧЮ-перевірку мого акаунту, але не знайшов ніяких зв'язків ні з Bodiadub-ом, ні з будь-ким іншим, тому й просив yakudza мене заблокувати. Я вже піднімав питання порушень правил ЧЮ адміном goo3, але це нічого дало. Ось тут посилання
Я бачу безліч порушень goo3, і не я один, але інші чомусь нічого не роблять, адміністратори в тому числі. Така схема взагалі дуже зручна goo3 - хтось почав говорити про порушення правил - сказали, що то вікібізнес - заблокували, почистили СО, щоб ніхто нічого не бачив. І можна порушувати далі. Припускаю, що я вже не перший, з ким так розправилися. І я не переслідую goo3, як написав yakudza в описі блокування, а намагаюся добитися справедливості. Я писав на пошту різним користувачам, багато з них підтримують мене, але ніхто не хоче відкрито заявити про це, бо бояться блокування.--Пушинко (talk) 16:04, 28 April 2023 (UTC)