User talk:Pv.abhinav

May 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Panyam, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 22:48, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool[edit]

Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz
Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 23:55, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of P.V.Bheemasena Rao for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article P.V.Bheemasena Rao is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P.V.Bheemasena Rao until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 22:55, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing, advertising, sockpuppetry to avoid scrutiny. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 02:49, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pv.abhinav (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will not use my account for any vandalism please excus me for once , Thanks

Decline reason:

Request does not address the sockpuppetry, which includes the accounts at User:P.V.Abhinav Ranganath Rao and User:Arpvr. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:03, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please don't keep adding unblock requests on all your sock accounts, this is as disruptive as your behavior before the blocks. —SpacemanSpiff 08:52, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{db-u1|rationale=I don't want to get blocked always please delete my account the information that was provided by me regarding all articles is correct and i don't need to apologize anybody }

User talk pages are not deleted (nor are accounts). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:21, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pv.abhinav (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I won't vandalize from now onward i'm telling know then why don't you guys leave me I'll wikipedia as per the norms and conditions.Please leave me now and unblock me

Decline reason:

Once again, this doesn't address the reasons for your block. Yamla (talk) 14:53, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pv.abhinav (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i understood for what i was blocked for and will not do it again, and i will make productive contributions from now onwards by providing proper citaitons and references and i'll obey the policy and terms of use of wikipedia

Decline reason:

Firstly, you will need to address the sockpuppetry. Secondly, it would help if you could outline what kinds of "productive contributions" you intend to make if unblocked. Huon (talk) 00:52, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You still haven't mentioned the use of more than one account for editing. Peridon (talk) 18:54, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pv.abhinav (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me I nomore want to open new accounts. I will use my primary account itself. Please help me and pardon me for creating accounts. Please give me one chance. pvar9 (talk) 14:14, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you can go six months without any sock puppetry or IP block evasion, we'll reconsider your block per the standard offer. It looks like you were using Panraj recently. You can still edit Wikipedia in other languages or Wikimedia sister projects, but you need to stop editing English Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:45, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Cyphoidbomb (talk) , please pardon me and unblock me. I will never create new accounts and create unwanted pages. I will create only pages of most notable people. Please give me one chance. I want to contribute to Wikipedia alot. Please do consider my request. Waiting for your reply, Thank You. pvar9 (talk) 14:22, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pv.abhinav (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me. I no more want to create accounts, sorry. I want to use my primary account itself. Please help me and pardon me for creating accounts. Please give me one chance.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:34, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

pvar9 (talk) 01:28, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey their mate. Standard questions for unblock requests: What would you like to edit if unblocked, and how can administrators trust that you will not make any more accounts in the future? Heart ^(talk) 01:31, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Blocking administrator contacted and invited to join in the discussion on standard offer. Offering administrators contacted as well. Heart ^(talk) 01:39, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@HeartGlow30797: I mostly edit or create articles related to History of India, Notable people from India, Indian Cricket and Indian Cinema. - pvar9 (talk) 01:48, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What, if any, accounts have you edited with in the last 3 months. You were blocked for promotionalism/advertising. How would this time be different? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:49, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: Now i came to know the value of Wikipedia. I won't write anything promotional from now onwards. - pvar9 (talk) 02:07, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't answered Deepfriedokra's first question. only (talk) 02:17, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Only: I haven't edited anything on Wikipedia since last 7 months from any of my accounts. My humble request is that, if possible please delete all those accounts or please redirect them to this primary account. I don't want to create anymore accounts in the future. I will only use this primary account to edit wikiarticles - pvar9 (talk) 02:43, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]