User talk:Pymcalibrary

April 2010

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Wiki libs (talk) 14:08, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MrOllie (talk) 14:34, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The link you keep adding

Hey, you keep giving a link to a site that requires account creation to get content. Can you justify this? Please review WP:CONFLICT. Write me with questions. Blue Rasberry 14:35, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{you do not need to log in to view the first tier of information in all of our youth style tribe content. it provides a slideshow of images as well as pertinent bullet points relating to the subculture free of charge}}

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Rocker (subculture), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 15:20, 15 April 2010 (UTC) {we did not know this was considered spamming! let me know how i can best rectify this, thank you}[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for spamming or advertising. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid ^(Talk) 16:02, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pymcalibrary (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

sorry! we did not know what we were doing was going to get us blocked! we are more than happy to contribute to wikipedia with our insight, would this help our situation?

Decline reason:

If only someone had warned you that your behavior was likely to get you blocked... Syrthiss (talk) 17:27, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.