User talk:Pyule
Dear Sirs and madames,
Pleased be informed that my article is sourced in reputed journals and certainly is not 'a hoax' as you choose to put it. Moreover, it is my own discovery. I am by profession a known professor of archaeology. Regarding al-Nejd, there are several eye witnesses. A coin is on display in the National Museum and their is an unpublished find report. On what basis are you imputing this kind of allegation? My suggestion is that you read the relevant cited literature before making further accusations. If this is supposed to be a joke, it has a curious resemblance to mobbing.
Respectfully, Azd0815 (talk) 16:48, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Al-Nejd, Sultanate of Oman
[edit]Hello, Pyule,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Al-Nejd, Sultanate of Oman should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Nejd, Sultanate of Oman .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Dom from Paris (talk) 17:33, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lizq is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lizq until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dom from Paris (talk) 17:37, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
The article Jaugada has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
fails WP:GEOFEAT the only source was added by its author who created the article. WP:REFSPAM user.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dom from Paris (talk) 17:50, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
The article Kharligarh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
fails WP:GEOFEAT article created by the author of the only source. As such this is WP:OR and WP:REFSPAM
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dom from Paris (talk) 17:55, 6 February 2018 (UTC)