User talk:Pzpz

Image copyright problem with Image:Capital_sheffield.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Capital_sheffield.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:55, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Liverpoolfc0607.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Liverpoolfc0607.png. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ytny 18:53, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that all kit images you've uploaded lack detailed source information, are probable copyright violation, and are marked incorrectly as {{logo}}, and can be deleted immediately according to Wikipedia policies. Thank. 19:05, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Arsenal0607.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Arsenal0607.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:08, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Capitalsufc.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Capitalsufc.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:04, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Manchesterutd0607.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Manchesterutd0607.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:29, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Tottenham0607.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Tottenham0607.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:21, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Corner_stand_bramall.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Corner_stand_bramall.jpg.‎ I just wanted to let you know; I have now removed the photo you posted on April 20, 2006 in the Bramall Lane article. Again, Thank you for posting it in the first place it enhanced the article, but it is now no longer applicable as this stand has now been built and opened. If you want to post another photo of the stand as it looks now, this would be fine. Hope you understand.Hawksworthm 19:22, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sheffieldutd0607.png listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sheffieldutd0607.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bigr Tex 19:55, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bladeslogo2.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bladeslogo2.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --14:08, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page File:Sufc team lap.jpg has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. → Dylan 620 (Toolbox Alpha, Beta) 14:12, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Corner stand bramall.jpg[edit]

The file File:Corner stand bramall.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]