User talk:Qian6666

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Qian6666, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Darwinek (talk) 01:42, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But... How did you calculate these temperatures?[edit]

Hi there! I've seen your contributions to adding mean maximums and mean minimums to many city climate charts, however it is believed, your contributions contains unsourced info. Can you please explain how you got those numbers and how you calculate them? If not, your unsourced edits may get removed or reverted. --We Need Wikipedia!^{Wikipedia is essential!!! Can't live without it!!!}(Say what?) 15:23, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions are very wrongly done[edit]

Can you please stop adding wrong and unsourced data and wrong reference links, such as you did to Saskylakh. If you repeatedly add such wrong info to the pages, you might get banned from editing Wikipedia for your whole life. --We Need Wikipedia!^{Wikipedia is essential!!! Can't live without it!!!}(Say what?) 10:52, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Weneedwikipedia: This user is long gone, but you are not .... I have looked over a few of their edits and they seem good to me. You are correct that the edit for Saskylakh did not have a source, but it is clear that they simply forgot to type in the URL, or mistakenly pasted the wrong URL, rather than deliberately misleading us, as you implied. —Soap— 15:15, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OK Im burned out from all of this ... there are no good and bad editors, everyone makes mistakes, including myself, and here is a bad one from this user. That does not negate all of the good edits just as the good edits dont negate the bad ones. My blessings to anyone who actually has the patience to straighten or even attempt to straighten all of this out. —Soap— 17:25, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]