User talk:QueenStaceySlater

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Trinitydevine per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Trinitydevine. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 23:52, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

QueenStaceySlater (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not this person and have no clue as to who this person is. I ask for some proper evidence why you believe I am this person before blocking this account. I understand the concerns of sockpuppetry, but I have no reason to believe I have warranted this blocking. I just dont know who that is and please explain your reasonings. QueenStaceySlater (talk) 08:18, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. 331dot (talk) 08:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

QueenStaceySlater (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

sorry just saw your reasoning and I’d like to reiterate that I don’t know who tribitydivine is and my reasonings. I commonly edit the fandom wiki pages so I am familiar with basic editing techniques which is why I knew how redirects and other stuff work. While I understand your concerns as sockpuppetry is serious, your decision to block the account was fairly impulsive and baseless and to punish Trinity and Honeysweetlike just because I performed one editing behavior seems a little silly, though I understand concerns. I didnt know you can’t create pages without asking and I promise it won’t happen again. QueenStaceySlater (talk) 08:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't think this is a big coincidence. Maybe someone else will, but not me. 331dot (talk) 08:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Generally permission is not needed before creating articles. 331dot (talk) 08:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:George Knight EastEnders.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:George Knight EastEnders.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]