User talk:Qwert uyi

Regarding your edits to Print Camp:

Your recent edit to Print Camp (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 10:40, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Qwert uyi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Awyong J. M. Salleh 10:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Print Camp

The article Print Camp has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Awyong J. M. Salleh 10:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Faith nominations

Nominating several articles for deletion because the article you created is considered poor form and can be seen as vandalism if it continues. Please read WP:POINT.--Crossmr 05:47, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Off to a bad start

Don't get stressed, Wikipedia's rule structure is incredibly complex but in the end it boils down to a few fundamental things:

everything in Wikipedia must be stated from a neutral point of view
everything in Wikipedia must be verifiable and attributable to reliable sources
Wikipedia is not just a directory

What that means is that you need to show that your article is not just a directory entry, but that the subject as some encyclopaedic merit, as established by other people. Not CNet customer reviews, genuine substantial coverage in the tech press or newspapers. Otherwise we can't verify that it meets our core policies.

Please believe that you are not the first person to get off to a bad start like this. Take some time to read around the project, especially the Five Pillars of Wikipedia, and you will come to understand why we remove articles which lack strong sourcing. Guy (Help!) 09:35, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why are only select companies or setups allowed to have articles about them and not others? What harm is there in writing stubs about related companies?uyi 09:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Because if those stubs do not have proper attribution, then they are open to having all kinds of possibly fake information inserted in them. Ab e g92contribs 11:12, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]