User talk:R2d2 ka baap

Article/translation

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, R2d2 ka baap! Thank you for your contributions. I am I dream of horses and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 04:17, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

R2d2 ka baap, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi R2d2 ka baap! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Worm That Turned (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:30, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Flag of India[edit]

I've replied to your post there, I think we are in general agreement there but I've reverted the article to the earlier state pending some sort of discussion on the points. —SpacemanSpiff 02:28, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Indian subcontinent, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Human3015 Call me maybe!! • 19:57, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A scholarly source was added in the note, is entirely consistent with rest of article and also reflects reality of this article's main picture. R2d2 ka baap (talk) 06:00, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are on 3RR[edit]

Hello user, on Indian subcontinent you have reverted 2 users 3 times in 24 hours, one more revert on that page will make you candidate to get blocked. So be careful while making reverts, you should not make drastic changes to long standing original version without consensus. You still can get blocked on 3 reverts because you reverted 2 users without consensus, but your 4th revert will definitely block you, so this is notice for that. Take care. --Human3015 Call me maybe!! • 00:24, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have provided sources for my versions. These sources have been consistently ignored and reverted to an original version that has no sources. Does this block warning apply to you as well then? R2d2 ka baap (talk) 06:00, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have done just 2 reverts. --Human3015 Call me maybe!! • 00:35, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Answer my substantive points please. Meanwhile, do not revert the version which has more sources backing it. Mmkay? R2d2 ka baap (talk) 06:00, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TopGun (talk • contribs) 07:51, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Indian subcontinent. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. —Darkwind (talk) 09:04, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Advice[edit]

Hello user, you were recently blocked for 24 hours but your ban has been ended still you seem to be not active on Wikipedia in editing. I want to give you advice that you should not get worried or discouraged by bans, you don't have to think that no one is supporting you on Wikipedia and you are alone. As I saw your contribution you seem to be a good editor and you always write with sources. You are surely not disruptive editor. You got blocked because of your edits on Indian subcontinent but there are thousands of other pages you can edit. If you have time then you should edit Wikipedia, also you can join talk page of Indian subcontinent and we can add one line somewhere in article that "according to some sources part west to Indus river not included in Indian subcontinent" if not in infobox. So don't lose your hope as a Wikipedia editor, you can continue editing without any sorrow. Till now I have been blocked for 3 times, but see I'm still active on Wikipedia and give positive contribution. When one becomes experienced, gets blocked, then you become better editor. Cheers.--Human3015 knock knock • 20:26, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]