User talk:R30591

Welcome[edit]

Hello, R30591, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

R30591, good luck, and have fun. Packerfan386beer here 07:07, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shahab Moradi[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shahab Moradi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JBchrch talk 19:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spamming?[edit]

Hi R30591, I see that the majority of your contributions to date have been related to Shahab Moradi, including the article you wrote that was speedy deleted per WP:G11 and the new article about that you just published. I assume that you are just a fan of his: is this correct? In any case, I strongly advise to take a break from adding content about Moradi and to concentrate on other topics, because at this point, it very much looks like you are WP:SPAMming the project. JBchrch talk 17:14, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JBchrch, well everyone likes him! me included and this is not fair to delete a page only because You think the writer might also be a fan. I hadn't crossed any Wiki guidline boundaries. This looks to be coming from hatred and something personal against this famous and popular figure rather than professionalism. 188.211.87.125 (talk) 07:46, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shahab Moradi moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Shahab Moradi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:20, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shahab Moradi has been accepted[edit]

Shahab Moradi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dege31 (talk) 13:01, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dege31 That was great news Dege31 ! Thank you :) R30591 (talk) 22:11, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shahab Moradi[edit]

Hi R30591,

I apologize that I was bit overzealous in cleaning up the Shahab Moradi article and accidentally deleted a few useful links. The issue with the original was that it had a promotional tone. For example, details of religious beliefs such as "He does not consider flood necessarily from God's Anger and believes that rain is a trace of God's kindness" usually do not belong in Wikipedia articles. In its current state I believe it will be kept as an article. I encourage you to add to it, but keeping this key policy of a neutral point of view in mind. I just think your article has quite a bit of merit, and didn't want someone else axing it before you could learn about the relevant policies. Again, I apologize if it was discouraging. I think you can re-expand upon the "Academic activities" section, but please do so in a neutral manner. For example, details such as "This question-answer based class is attended by a large number of students" unduly praises the subject. Thanks, and let me know if you have any questions. Ovinus (talk) 18:09, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ovinus Thank you for your kind and promp response and thank you for all the tips you shared benevolently. R30591 (talk) 17:08, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]