User talk:RA0808/Archives2013/May
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
ZM (New Zealand)
Thanks for reverting a mistaken revert I made on ZM (New Zealand). --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 02:03, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
animal torture for fun and profit....
Judge Sim Lake, as you are probably aware, recently dismissed charges against a couple making porn films in which animals were tortured to death.
As he is not directly accountable, I feel that making people aware of this action, and registering disapproval is valid.
I am sorry that you do not agree, and even sorrier of you think that his actions are in any way acceptable
Dr Mike Parker
University of West London — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.67.230.190 (talk) 22:08, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
- You can justify all you like, but the point remains that you vandalized a Wikipedia page and you were warned for it. Wikipedia is not a soapbox and certainly not the place for vandalism as petty acts of reprisal against foreign supreme court justices (or, for that matter, implying that those who revert your vandalism condone torturing animals). Regards, RA0808 talkcontribs 22:15, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
- Dear Professor Parker: Hurting animals, and making videos of it, are both horrible and depraved, and laws against it should be strengthened and enforced. Judge Sim Lake's ruling was an abomination, and deserves every sort of negative reaction. If the allegation of his private predilection for sadistic videos is true, the evidence for it should be brought to light -- not just in WP but in all media. But just posting the allegation without any evidence is doing huge harm against the cause, both for animals, and for overturning Sim Lake's ruling. Please only re-post if you can cite objective, credible evidence. (I don't know what's meant by "genital disfunction", but unless it has a causal connection to Lake's alleged fondness for sadistic videos and/or his ruling, it should probably not be mentioned -- and certainly not without strong public evidence.) Stevan Harnad 20:19, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
- Very well spoken Mr. Harnad, but this alleged "Doctor" was editing from an IP address and is obviously long gone. Incidentally, thank you kindly for catching that last bit of vandalism that I accidentally restored. I must have misread the preview. Regards, RA0808 talkcontribs 05:32, 27 May 2013 (UTC)