User talk:RAHB

Welcome!

Hello, RAHB, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Ixfd64 (talk) 07:59, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome. Been here about a year, but it's appreciated all the same. I've seen how quickly recent changes gets cluttered. I hope to be as beneficial to the site as I can. You wouldn't happen to be able to disclose any information about the policy of users gaining rollback rights, would you? Thanks again. -RA HB 08:08, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Requests for permissions for information. I don't think there's a "hard" policy on rollback rights; it's usually up to the discretion of the administrator. In general, you will be able to get rollback access if you are in good standing and show a strong ability in discerning between good faith edits and vandalism. --Ixfd64 (talk) 09:16, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Very good. As I more or less expected. Thank you for the help. -RA HB 20:09, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for my tirade[edit]

If by any chance, could you please resurrect any of my Uncyclopedia pages that I made and tell MrN9000 that I'm trying?

PS-Can you please give me your e-mail so I can write a full apology?Warren67 (talk) 22:43, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Information[edit]

I noticed your username commenting at an Arbcom discussion regarding civility. An effort is underway that would likely benifit if your views were included. I hope you will append regards at: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Civility enforcement/Questionnaire Thank you for considering this request. My76Strat (talk) 11:14, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Uncyclopedians[edit]

I feel like we should finish that Wikipedia for Uncyclopedians thing. Some folks really seem like they could use a definitive essay thrown at them to sum things up, especially given recent events, so having one might be helpful. I guess. -— Isarra ༆ 20:02, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. That's a good idea. Needs more cowbell. -RA HB 20:56, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rob![edit]

What the hell I'm thinking... Why did I even wrote this? I mean, actually there isn't any meaning for this. I'd have some use for brains. Have any? CAT (CATLITTER) 11:42, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Use for brains can only go so far. After that, we must harness the power of machines! Modeled after the abacus, naturally. -RA HB 11:58, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]