User talk:REsmiley

No complaints

I am not vandalizing Wikipedia, so if I see a complaint about it, I will reply. REsmiley (talk) 22:21, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dont block this account

Im warning you REsmiley (talk) 23:24, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 07:56, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:45, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You broke my rule

My rule was "Do not block this account" and if you break this rule, this will be the last time I wil make a new account REsmiley (talk) 16:50, 22 November 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

REsmiley (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19834 was submitted on Nov 22, 2017 17:07:17. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 17:07, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock reason

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

REsmiley (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was a sockpuppet of my main account

Decline reason:

No reason to unblock was offered. Don't know if the WP:standard offer apples. See you back in 6 months. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:12, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.