User talk:RNG6677

November 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Nalbari, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:55, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Nalbari. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 08:49, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Nalbari, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 08:51, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did with this edit to Nalbari. Materialscientist (talk) 08:53, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

I write genuine text 100% real. I recover collage photo of Nalbari & new information you removed new information Materialscientist. I recovering & don't remove the text RNG6677 (talk) 11:16, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

I came here to block you but I see Materialscientist gave you a final warning so I will wait until the next instance. You are copying material that is copyrighted which is a violation. You must stop. S Philbrick(Talk) 14:28, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Rangiya. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:37, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:52, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 17:35, 12 November 2023 (UTC)