User talk:RObin207$$mercury203

Welcome![edit]

Hello, RObin207$$mercury203, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Interstate 295 (Maine). I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 331dot (talk) 15:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TypingInTheSky (talk) 16:56, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. TypingInTheSky (talk) 16:57, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@TypingInTheSky: How are this user's edits vandalism? 331dot (talk) 17:01, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

They aren't, I am sorry. I am a piece of garbage TypingInTheSky (talk) 17:21, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Maine State Route 113 with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Rrburke (talk) 16:22, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Block appeas[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RObin207$$mercury203 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This ip is not a proxy

Decline reason:

This account isn't blocked. If you see a block message when you try to edit, please provide the IP given in that message. Huon (talk) 20:17, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RObin207$$mercury203 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

ip block address 75.68.184.139

Decline reason:

Now directly blocked. Elockid^(BOO!) 20:49, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RObin207$$mercury203 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Could someone connect the permablock dots for me/ I have made only constructive edits, and the warnings on my talk page were misunderstandings

Decline reason:

Could you list all the accounts you have created? PhilKnight (talk) 23:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Looks like this is a checkuser-based block. Such blocks are very difficult to overturn. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 17:14, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RObin207$$mercury203 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sure, Richardparker207, Dumddum, The Openproxycool series and a few others. Yeah, I'm a sockmaster. I'm not retarded in thinking that this will not be overturned. Also, you might want to edit Openproxycool's page to reflect that Richardparker207 is the master and move the socks off of Openproxycool's suspected page.

Decline reason:

You our done wasting our time. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:35, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.