User talk:RRfeatures

Would like to know from John Pack Lambert what makes Steven Richter's page not notable? I will resolve it.

Would like to know from Cupper52 why the Steven Richter page isn't clear? I've worked on it since yesterday and feel it's clearer now. If you could please verify.

Would like to know from [[1]] why Steven Richter's page isn't passing? I've done work on it since yesterday with proper links and clearer text.

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, RRfeatures. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Steven Richter, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:54, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Notability[edit]

Hello RRfeatures,

If you want tips on how to improve an article or the proper way to write an encyclopedic article you may want to check out the Teahouse. In regards to the concerns with the Richter article, it appears most do not believe the sources included in the article are reliable or not independent and do not offer significant coverage to the subject. The notability guidelines for Wikipedia can be found here WP:N. Articles may be written on subjects that receive significant in-depth coverage in multiple intellectually independent secondary reliable sources. But keep in mind, presuming notability to create an article is fine, however, that presumption can be rebutted and the article nominated for AfD. At which time a consensus of basically anonymous editors will decide the fate of the article based on the afore mentioned policy. The article may be kept or may be deleted. That is why you should add as many reliable sources to the article as possibly. This increases the chances of the article being retained. --ARose Wolf 15:32, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]