User talk:RU-6972

And the home of the Brave

November 2015[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:38, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:RU-6972/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 23:28, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! RU-6972, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 23:28, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Test (November 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cult of Green was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Test and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cult of Green (talk) 04:40, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Help (command) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Help (command) was changed by RU-6972 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.931683 on 2015-11-21T00:08:53+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:08, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015[edit]

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, as you did at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Edit bot 2, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your recent bot requests have been denied and/or deleted. Please review Wikipedia:Not ready to be a bot operator. You would need to demonstrate much more editorial and bot project experience before being authorized to run a bot making thousands of edits per day. Your continued requests are causing a disruption, and need to stop. — xaosflux ^Talk 16:47, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Earwig ^talk 23:26, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry it has come to this, but based on a review of your contributions I see many recent instances of vandalism or other unhelpful edits. It doesn't seem like you are here to build an encyclopedia. — Earwig ^talk 23:32, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RU-6972 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wanted to make a Bot And Im Sorry if i Ignored It Give me a Second chance first of all I ignored the Warnings Because I Should Have read the bot policy Should i Get a Second chance I dont Know how to make Bots Can you Unblock Me to show me how to RU-6972 (talk) 17:22, 5 December 2015 (UTC) RU-6972 (talk) 17:22, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You registered here less than a month ago, and you have only made a very small number of edits to articles - and about half of those were pure vandalism! And then you were spamming silly bot requests that look a lot like trolling! And you think you stand any chance of being unblocked and allowed to make and run a bot with a request like that?! Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:34, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RU-6972 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please Unblock this account so i can go on My New Account that was named after a Knight RU-6972 (talk) 21:00, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Max Semenik (talk) 21:26, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.