User talk:Rachyandco

Welcome![edit]

Hi Rachyandco! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Missvain (talk) 20:29, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the warm welcome

Rachyandco (talk) 09:36, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Digital integrity (December 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nightenbelle was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads like an opinion piece- not an encyclopedic article. This needs to be a non-biased review of the topic- and should most definitely not start with a statement in wiki- voice like "Everyone has the right to the respect for his physical (or bodily) and mental integrity" Not arguing my opinion on that statement (since I do agree with it)- but it is an opinion and needs to be attributed to someone/something.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Digital integrity and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Digital integrity, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nightenbelle (talk) 18:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the review and comment.

our aim was to provide a translation of the page that exist already in french https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Int%C3%A9grit%C3%A9_num%C3%A9rique_(droit) and in German https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recht_auf_digitale_Unversehrtheit

we will try to review to meet the express requirement. Rachyandco (talk) 22:33, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rachyandco! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nightenbelle (talk) 18:47, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Digital integrity (January 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Digital integrity and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Digital integrity, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 01:57, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Digital integrity[edit]

Hello, Rachyandco. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Digital integrity, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Digital integrity[edit]

Hello, Rachyandco. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Digital integrity".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:07, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Digital integrity[edit]

Hello, Rachyandco. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Digital integrity".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:27, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Rachyandco", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because usernames that are simply names of companies or groups, or usernames that imply shared access, such as "Jack and Jill", are not permitted. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Jay 💬 11:03, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

it s a pseudonym. I use it for my github account https://github.com/rachyandco or reddit account https://www.reddit.com/user/rachyandco/

it is not a company name, it is not a shared name. Rachyandco (talk) 12:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying. Apart from the name, I saw above where you said our aim was to provide... and we will try to review... implying speaking for a team. Jay 💬 12:48, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

do you think I can get the draft back? I failed to see how i could view it last time Rachyandco (talk) 13:07, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, it is usually done within a few minutes or hours. You did not respond regarding the above quoted text though. Jay 💬 02:20, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sorry. in deed I, I was casually using the plural form as I am the writer of the french and german version of the Digital integrity article, and other wikipedians have helped me already to improve the articles, so hence I was saying "we" as they would definitely help also.

the link here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Digital_integrity&action=edit&redlink=1 for me is still empty. Rachyandco (talk) 09:52, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]