User talk:Radionut

Welcome!

Hello, Radionut, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially those to the William Eric Alexander article. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

emerson7 14:35, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

.

License tagging for Image:BillAlexander2001.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:BillAlexander2001.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby release it into the public domain. This applies worldwide.

If this is not legally possible:

I grant any entity the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:06, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:NETIOLogo.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:NETIOLogo.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby release it into the public domain. This applies worldwide.

If this is not legally possible:

I grant any entity the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 02:46, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bill, Justine and Dez.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Bill, Justine and Dez.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby release it into the public domain. This applies worldwide.

If this is not legally possible:

I grant any entity the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 16:37, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop vandalizing it would be greatly appreciated —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaharous (talk • contribs) 05:57, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

William Eric Alexander[edit]

There appears to be an edit war going on at this page, I'd suggest since WP:3RR is in danger of being violated, all involved parties could take their problems to the article's talk page and try and work it out. Good luck! Dayewalker (talk) 06:19, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am Bill Alexander (William Eric Alexander) and the information that was being changed by me was incorrect. This page need to be edited or deleted.

Radionut background[edit]

Radionut is the handle of Radio Talkshow host Bill Alexander

September 2008[edit]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article William Eric Alexander, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. emerson7 03:15, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008[edit]

Please do not use styles that are unusual or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in William Eric Alexander. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Thank you. please take a moment or two to the various wikipedia style guides to help you with creating properly formatted articles. emerson7 14:30, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

fascination?[edit]

fascination? lol....actually none. my only concern is that your editing is not in compliance with established style guidelines. please also note that you may be in violation of wikipaedia's rules governing conflicts of interest. please take some time to review these areas in order to avoid continued removal of your contributions. cheers! --emerson7 17:18, 7 October 2008 (UTC) ![reply]

You've been mentioned at the WP:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard[edit]

Hello Radionut. You are welcome to join that discussion and give your own opinion. EdJohnston (talk) 04:35, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. your editing at William Eric Alexander is really quite outlandish by our current standards. Wikipedia is not your personal website, and you do not pay us to advertise here. Please take this seriously or you may be blocked. Your best course of action would be to respond to the Conflict of Interest complaint as I mentioned above. If you are willing to edit within our policies you should not have any trouble. EdJohnston (talk) 21:11, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of William Eric Alexander[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article William Eric Alexander, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. EdJohnston (talk) 03:45, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]