User talk:Radix38

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Radix38 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

(I don't think that it's fair that I'm getting blocked when somebody else is making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia.)

Decline reason:

Clearing an autoblock

Due to the nature of the block applied we need additional information before we can decide whether to unblock you. It is very likely that you are not personally blocked. If you are prevented from editing, it may be because you are autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. Without further details there is nothing further we can do to review or lift your block. Please follow these instructions:

If you have a Wikipedia account, please ensure that you are logged in.
Your account name will be visible in the top right of this page if you are.
If it isn't, try bypassing your web browser's cache.
Try to edit the Sandbox.
If you are still blocked, copy the {{unblock-ip|...}} code generated for you under the "IP blocked?" section. This is usually hidden within the "What do I do now?" section. If so, just click the "[show]" link to the right hand side to show this text.
Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page and click save.

If you are not blocked from editing the sandbox then the autoblock on your IP address has already expired and you can resume editing. — Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 03:44, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Radix38 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

(Okay, why am I being blocked indefinitely, what the heck did I do?)

Decline reason:

See below discussion and Checkuser results. — Daniel Case (talk) 13:36, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Radix38 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

(I'm clearly not here for vandalism. Why don't you just look over the block again, I didn't even make any unconstructive edits.)

Decline reason:

You made five edits, then three minutes after one of them some vandal who happens to share your IP, which is not listed to a business or organization, shows up and vandalizes the page. What conclusion are we supposed to draw? You've used up your requests; we're protecting the page now. — Daniel Case (talk) 19:29, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Radix38 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

76.189.8.173 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Sdfl;jsakdf;asdjk". The reason given for Sdfl;jsakdf;asdjk's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

Blocking administrator: Kurt Shaped Box (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: per the evidence below, two accounts are clearly being used by the same person in a way that is against Wikipedia policy. I will be presently extending the block on this account to indefinite

--Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:47, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a question. How do explain the fact that you created a page, and then almost immediately, another random guy shows up and vandalizes it? That seems very suspicious to me. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 04:00, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I share the concerns of J.delanoy. If Radix38 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) can't explain this unusual sequence of events, I suggest that the account Radix38 should be indef blocked as a vandal-only account and the IP be blocked for 30 days. Both the IP and User:Sdfl;jsakdf;asdjk are here only for vandalism, and Radix38 was hit by the autoblock, showing that he is a user of IP 76.189.8.173. It seems unlikely that Radix can escape the negative assocations. The article Segment Addition Postulate created by Radix38 is a slight rewording of some course notes provided by another web site. EdJohnston (talk) 04:32, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Roadrunner isn't flagging it as shared/educational/business, either, in their rwhois database. So, this is likely a personal residence:

(koder@stewie:pts/6) ~ % rwhois -s ipmt.rr.com -p 4321 -v 76.189.8.173
Connecting to ipmt.rr.com:4321
Results:

Class-Name                    network
ID                            NETBLK-isrr-76.189.0.0-18
Auth-Area                     76.189.0.0/18
Network-Name                  isrr-76.189.0.0
IP-Network                    76.189.0.0/18
IP-Network-Block              76.189.0.0 - 76.189.63.255
Organization                  Road Runner
Tech-Contact                  ipaddreg@rr.com
Admin-Contact                 IPADD-ARIN
Created                       20081031
Updated                       20081031
Updated-By                    ipaddreg@rr.com

Class-Name                    network
ID                            NETBLK-ISRR-76.188.0.0/15
Auth-Area                     76.188.0.0/15
Network-Name                  ISRR-76.188.0.0
IP-Network                    76.188.0.0/15
IP-Network-Block              76.188.0.0 - 76.189.255.255
Organization                  Road Runner
Tech-Contact                  ipaddreg@rr.com
Admin-Contact                 IPADD-ARIN
Created                       20081031
Updated                       20081031
Updated-By                    ipaddreg@rr.com

Cheers. --slakr^\ talk / 04:57, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed Metalx97856 (talk · contribs) as master acct = Metalx97857 (talk · contribs) = Sdfl;jsakdf;asdjk (talk · contribs) = Radix38 (talk · contribs) = 76.189.8.173 (talk · contribs). IP extended to one month block. Users already indef'd. Tagged all. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:44, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]