User talk:Rahik1

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Rahik1/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Origamite^ⓣⓒ 18:29, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Rahik1, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Origamite^ⓣⓒ 18:29, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mātrusri Anasuya Devī (November 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lixxx235 was:

3=I'm very sorry, but at this time, I am declining your Article for Creation submission. Your submission was close to passing. However, assuming your subject was notable, there were some minor issues that could be resolved in 5-10 minutes. Under normal circumstances, I would have fixed the issues myself; however, because the Articles for Creation backlog is reaching extremely high levels, it is not currently possible for reviewers to fix them. One thing you can work on is formatting the references in a standard format.

What you can do: Ensure that the article is more clear with citations in a standard format to demonstrate notability. Ensure full compliance with the manual of style. Come on to the Wikipedia live help channel on IRC. (instant access). If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page.

Cheers, Thanks, L235-Talk Ping when replying 04:10, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mātrusri Anasuya Devī and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cheers, Thanks, L235-Talk Ping when replying 04:17, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mātrusri Anasuya Devī concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mātrusri Anasuya Devī, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mātrusri Anasuya Devī[edit]

Hello, Rahik1. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Mātrusri Anasuya Devī".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:24, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jillellamudi[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jillellamudi, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.jillellamudiamma.org/svjp/index.php/contact/about-jillellamudi.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Jillellamudi Amma, motherofall.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jillellamudi Amma, motherofall.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 02:35, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mātrusri Anasuya Devī (March 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mātrusri Anasuya Devī and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:11, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mātrusri Anasuya Devī (March 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

Still questionable and still needs any further available in-depth third-party sources overall.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mātrusri Anasuya Devī and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 07:56, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]