User talk:Rahulheer18

This is Rahulheer18's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: 255 Medium Regiment (June 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:255 Medium Regiment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:56, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rahulheer18! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:56, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 255 Medium Regiment (June 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:255 Medium Regiment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 19:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it is one of a large number of accounts which are all participating in a programme of editing contrary to Wikipedia's guideline on conflict of interest, the policy on promotional editing, and the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use relating to paid editing. In addition, much of the editing from these accounts shows a lack of competence in writing coherent and meaningful English text. If multiple accounts are used to perform coordinated editing, and some of those accounts have been blocked to put a stop to unsuitable editing, Wikipedia's policy on use of multiple accounts authorises administrators to treat subsequent editing as evasion of the blocks, and therefore to block any more of the accounts without further warning. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock of your account. To do so, first read the guide to appealing blocks, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} to the bottom of the talk page of your original account, replacing the words "Your reason here" with a statement of why you think unblocking your account would be beneficial to the project. JBW (talk) 21:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rahulheer18 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am neither doing any promotional editing nor i an involved in any type of paid editing. The content i am writing is about the organization I am working with. please unblock me as soon as possible so that i may be able to add more references and citations to my article to make it combatible with wikipedia guidelines. Thank you Rahulheer18 (talk) 06:38, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the concerns described in the block notice. If you work for the Indian government, the Indian military, or some other organization that is undertaking a large effort to edit Wikipedia, that needs to be disclosed per WP:COI and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 07:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.