User talk:Rahulmeghoffical

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rahulmeghoffical (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Team, I want to said that I have created wikipedia account @Rahul Megh Arya who have been blocked due to advertisement words encounter here. In that case i have a new account @Rahulmeghoffical for creation of myself bio. But Wikipedia team every time blocked me. Why are you blocked me. I am real there you know that. Stop Wikipedia when you are blocked any one real person.

You can Check again @Rahul Megh Arya and @Rahulmeghoffical.

Decline reason:

Sorry, but on Wikipedia, blocks are intended to be for a specific *editor*, not a specific account. Thus, creating a new account to continue editing after one's previous account has been blocked is forbidden; this is referred to in Wikipedia parlance as block evasion. If you want to continue editing, you need to appeal the block on your original account, which I see you're attempting to do; only if those appeals succeed can you resume editing. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 15:33, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rahul Megh Arya, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 14:41, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Yunshui ^雲 _水 15:18, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]