User talk:Raich

Welcome!

Hello, Raich, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Best alpine skiers, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 18:27, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Best alpine skiers[edit]

The article Best alpine skiers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced content that violates WP:NPOV

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 18:27, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Shepherd bay. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Article has been deleted something lame from CBW 22:59, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Shepherd bay, you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. something lame from CBW 03:54, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010[edit]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 18:08, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shepherd bay[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Shepherd bay, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://blogs.aviation.ca/index.php/steve.php/2007/04. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:29, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 48 hours, for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 10:44, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010[edit]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 15:25, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shepherd Bay, Nunavut[edit]

There is no such community as Shepherd Bay, Nunavut in that sense. There is the deserted DEW Line site and an actual bay. However, there is no community with people living there. The coordinates you give appear to be for the DEW Line site. The 2006 census link was for Resolute and if you go to the S section you can see there is no listing for the place. Stop adding nonsense pages. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 23:19, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

climate of Oymyakon[edit]

I notice you made some changes to the climate data in the Oymyakon article. Where did you get the new information from? I'm looking at the article's cited source, and it appears to say that the June record high should be 31.1 degrees, not 30.1 degrees, and so on down the line. The article was semiprotected to stop changes like these. --Stepheng3 (talk) 19:12, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to second Stepheng3. Unless you are prepared to back up your numbers with a better, more reliable source, the numbers in the article should not be changed. Thank you.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); August 2, 2010; 14:25 (UTC)

August 2010[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 16:26, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]