User talk:Rajarajancheetak2010

December 2010[edit]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 08:36, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page to follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons' policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring and sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account or IP being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! —SpacemanSpiff 08:40, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CFD[edit]

This template must be substituted. Replace {{Cfd-notify ...}} with {{subst:Cfd-notify ...}}. --Soman (talk) 12:46, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Murugan temples[edit]

Template:Murugan temples has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 08:49, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tamilian martial arts[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JoshuaWalker | Talk to Me 10:06, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tamil folklore[edit]

The article Tamil folklore has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article seems to exist purely to show a navbox.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 13:36, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent contributions[edit]

I have reverted your recent addition of a non-English website to three articles. One of these articles was Yadava, which quite specifically says at the very top of the page is an article about the ancient people of that name and not about Yadavs. However, you added the same link to two other community articles (Pallar and Palliyar) that appear not to be of the Yadav community, and yet for all three contributions claimed that the (identical) link was a community pressure group. That seems unlikely to me, bearing in mind how caste associations work. I did look at the website, after working out why your link didn't actually point to it, and it had the appearance of being highly promotional: the main slideshow seemed to consist of photos of people making speeches etc and nothing else, for example.

I also reverted your edit at All India Samathuva Makkal Katchi. You changed that article from saying that the AISMK was a Tamil political party to saying that it was a Nadar political party. The article is very badly sourced but if you are going to change it in that way then you really should provide some verification. Replacing one unsourced statement with another achieves nothing. - Sitush (talk) 19:09, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

I noticed that you placed a Talkback notice on Funnyfarmofdoom's userpage. I have removed it; be sure to use the user talk page instead (User talk:Funnyfarmofdoom). Thanks.Jasper Deng (talk) 06:57, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Indian Vedic Science[edit]

The article Indian Vedic Science has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The main topic is unsourced (the references point elsewhere) and it is very difficult to understand.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jasper Deng (talk) 07:00, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Indian Vedic Science[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Indian Vedic Science. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Vedic science. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Vedic science - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 07:08, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Paraiyar, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 09:40, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Rape of draupadi[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Rape of draupadi, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.boloji.com/index.cfm?md=Content&sd=Articles&ArticleID=1194. As a copyright violation, Rape of draupadi appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Rape of draupadi has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Rape of draupadi and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Rape of draupadi with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Rape of draupadi.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:29, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article B. R. Ambedkar, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

This contribution also looked suspiciously like a copyright violation. Now, you have had warnings for such things before and I really do hope that you will now learn from them. Serial breaches of copyright by a contributor is blockable behaviour. Sitush (talk) 17:22, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dalith[edit]

Template:Dalith has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that and the other (talk) 03:15, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tamil folklore[edit]

Template:Tamil folklore has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 02:53, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]