User talk:Rajeshkamboj

May 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Pcuser42. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Universal Serial Bus, because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. pcuser42 (talk) 05:34, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Global warming. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. EricEnfermero ^Howdy! 10:59, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Julius Richard Petri, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Ged UK 08:47, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ged UK 11:14, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rajeshkamboj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Although I am Posting Links from the same Website but these are for betterment of wikipedia. They are useful and spam free containing relevant information which is not available on wikipedia pages. I think that should not be a reason to block someone who is adding useful information to Wikipedia

Decline reason:

Whether you believe the links improved Wikipedia or not is irrelevant - you were warned repeatedly to stop and continued regardless. Since your unblock request indicates that you do not see the problem with your actions, I am declining it. Yunshui 雲‍水 12:54, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2013[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Area 51, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:39, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are not currently blocked but you will be if you keep spamming links to your website. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:12, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ged UK 20:39, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rajeshkamboj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not edited anything after last time i got blocked. Please unblock me. It is not justice with a user. Have you blacklisted me to be searched in search engines ? please please, it is a request and i will never edit any article on wikipedia in future, i swear. Rajeshkamboj (talk) 05:28, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:34, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were blocked for this before, and you clearly haven't understood why, or changed your behaviour. Ged UK 20:41, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You were blocked in May. When the block expired, you added links to your website in July and August before being blocked again. And no, your site currently has not been blacklisted by Wikipedia. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:56, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are assured that we do not and cannot blacklist your site from being found by search engines on the internet. Any blacklisting we do prevents the site in question being linked to in articles here on Wikipedia. We might sometimes wish that we could do it outside, but our powers in this are limited to the Wikipedia organisation. You would still be found on Google. Peridon (talk) 12:44, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rajeshkamboj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry for all the things what i did in the past but please unblock me now. I swear i will never use wikipedia as a traffic vehicle but those people who wants to add my site as reference in the wikipedia articles are not allowed to do so, that is not fair. My website has a lot of valuable articles which can be used by people as reference in wikipedia. Even if you dont want me to allow to post anything here, its okay but let allow the other people. Thanks Rajeshkamboj (talk) 15:21, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We're not going to help you promote your website, period -- and you've effectively made it impossible for anyone else to use it on Wikipedia. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 16:54, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rajeshkamboj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello friends, I was a kid then and I got blocked here indefinitely. It is my last request, please unblock me, I will never go wrong way in future, I promise. Thanx Rajeshkamboj (talk) 15:00, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No response to the question below in 4+ days. And the "I was a kid" idea is laughable, as Master of Puppets points out. only (talk) 13:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Okay, if unblocked, what kind of edits do you intend to make? Please be detailed. Max Semenik (talk) 16:58, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to note that "I was a kid then" doesn't really fly as an excuse when the block was issued mere months ago. m.o.p 23:54, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rajeshkamboj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First of All I won't add any spammy link to any article. No. 2, there are a lot of Pages in Punjabi Singers/Artist category which have not been updated for years, I have sufficient knowledge about these artists because they belongs to my region. And As I was banned for adding links of my website to wikipedia, It should be unbanned from wikipedia, I swear I won't add any link by myself but It must be opened for the rest of users, Suppose anybody is linking it to the wikipedia from my IP Address, then you can ban me here for lifetime and definitely i will never go with such rubbish decision.

Decline reason:

Even now, you're arguing about allowing links to your website, which clearly indicates that you're here not to build an encyclopedia. You've made enough unblock requests already, so your right to make further appeals has been withdrawn. Max Semenik (talk) 09:57, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.