User talk:Rakonas

I contacted the blocking admin, this might take a while though, since he seems to be offline. -- lucasbfr ^talk 00:14, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): I will give you a chance and choose to accept your reason, against my better judgement. Please do not make any more silly edits. Request handled by: John 00:44, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--John 00:44, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to 4chan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. -- IRP ☎ 00:23, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rakonas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

why am i blocked?

Decline reason:

For vandalizing again after being given a second chance. Kuru ^talk 01:32, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rakonas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

seriously? I don't think i did

Decline reason:

[1] — Prodego ^talk 02:14, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You don't remember doing this [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=4chan&diff=prev&oldid=

263929652]? Templarion (talk) 01:40, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rakonas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That is strange..

Decline reason:

How do you explain this? — Tiptoety ^talk 02:48, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rakonas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hmm,when will I be unblocked. This situation is very confusing, I must say.

Decline reason:

You will be unblocked if and when you give us a decent reason to do so. Making another flippant request will result in this page being protected. — Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 03:45, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilkenny In early Norman times, up to the late 12th century, Kilkenny was the capital of the colony in Ireland. It also became the home of a preceptory of the Knights of St Thomas. By the late thirteenth century Kilkenny was under Norman-Irish control. The Norman presence in the town is still very evident. Kilkenny Castle was built on an outcrop of rock offering a natural vantage point at a prominent bend in the River Nore. This lies on the site of earlier wattle and mud structures and was the site of the fortifications of the Fitzpatricks and the O'Carrolls (AD 840), amongst others.[citation needed] A series of walls was built to protect the burghers. There were two townships Irishtown, and Englishtown. Irishtown had its charter from the bishops of Ossory and Englishtown which was established by William Marshal, 1st Earl of Pembroke.

A account of the Black Death from a monastery in Cill Chainnigh, by Friar John Clyn in 1348[9] ^n Grammar mistake, Ahhh!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rakonas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You will be unblocked if and when you give us a decent reason to do so-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilkenny In early Norman times, up to the late 12th century, Kilkenny was the capital of the colony in Ireland. It also became the home of a preceptory of the Knights of St Thomas. By the late thirteenth century Kilkenny was under Norman-Irish control. The Norman presence in the town is still very evident. Kilkenny Castle was built on an outcrop of rock offering a natural vantage point at a prominent bend in the River Nore. This lies on the site of earlier wattle and mud structures and was the site of the fortifications of the Fitzpatricks and the O'Carrolls (AD 840), amongst others.[citation needed] A series of walls was built to protect the burghers. There were two townships Irishtown, and Englishtown. Irishtown had its charter from the bishops of Ossory and Englishtown which was established by William Marshal, 1st Earl of Pembroke.A account of the Black Death from a monastery in Cill Chainnigh, by Friar John Clyn in 1348[9]grammar mistake, should be "An account". decent reason enough?

Decline reason:

Block is justified; User:Rakonas failed to give a valid reason for unblock several times. His behaviour constitutes an abuse of the unblock process. — Aitias // discussion 21:59, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You still have not explained why you made the edit Tiptoety linked to. I personally will not unblock you until you do. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 21:40, 22 January 2009 (UTC) Because.. wikipedia broke the rules of the internet.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rakonas (talk • contribs) [reply]

The internet has no rules, but wikipedia does. The edit was vandalism, pure and simple.— Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 22:49, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]