User talk:Ramdevkn

Speedy deletion nomination of Citrus Pay[edit]

Hello Ramdevkn,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Citrus Pay for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Prof. Mc (talk) 12:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please note that you are not supposed to remove the Speedy Deletion tag, as you are the creator of the page. Prof. Mc (talk) 13:36, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't know. New to Wikipedia. Please bear with me.

You might want to read through WP:YFA. I would suggest working on an article in your sandbox before creating anything. Prof. Mc (talk) 13:50, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. - Ramdevkn

Sure thing. Your sandbox is linked on the upper-right menu of this page. Prof. Mc (talk) 13:55, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Citrus Pay[edit]

The article Citrus Pay has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A WP:PROMO page on an unremarkable minor tech company & does not meet WP:NCORP. Significant RS coverage cannot be found to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]