User talk:Ramsey555

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Ramsey555, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:NazzKing the legendary life of this iconic celebrity illustrious career, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content protocols, and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are struck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you thru the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Sulfurboy (talk) 15:40, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:NazzKing the legendary life of this iconic celebrity illustrious career[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:NazzKing the legendary life of this iconic celebrity illustrious career, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sulfurboy (talk) 15:40, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NazzKing the legendary life of this iconic celebrity illustrious career (May 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NazzKing the legendary life of this iconic celebrity illustrious career and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NazzKing the legendary life of this iconic celebrity illustrious career, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:42, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ramsey555! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 15:42, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Hello, Ramsey555. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 19:04, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about NazzKing[edit]

Hello, Ramsey555, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Velella, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, NazzKing, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NazzKing.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Velella}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:12, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NazzKing for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NazzKing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NazzKing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:16, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As Velella wrote, You can leave a Keep comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NazzKing and also work to improve the article while it is up for deletion consideration. At the end of the consideration period an Administrator will decide to keep or delete. David notMD (talk) 14:43, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

These are the comments from the person who nominated it for AfD: "No evidence of notability. Sources are weak and mostly blogosphere. No evidence of chart success and sources don't seem to confirm claims made for them. Fails WP:SINGER." In the opinion of this person, career not (yet) notable to justify an article. David notMD (talk) 00:20, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Listing a few awards is valid, and if referenced, consider returning to article. in my opinion the Community work section is weak, and should be removed. Important you add a comment at the deletion consideration, stating that you are working to improve the article. David notMD (talk) 13:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I cleaned it up a bit, but you should still comment directly at the deletion discussion and continue to try to improve article. An Administrator will make a decision in 7-14 days. Good luck. David notMD (talk) 16:07, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

At the delete discussion, click on Edit at the top, then go to the bottom and type *Comment. Highlight the word Comment and click on the B to make it bold. Then write your comment. Won't hurt, might help. David notMD (talk) 16:11, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for the support that you have given me sir,God bless you.I was able to comment on that issue successfully all thanks to your guidance♠.I have made edits and included more source evidence to support the Page.I feel discriminate when they say the awards are not notable enough ,may is it because they are African Awards?Anyway upcoming genuine artist also need too be appreciated and documented in Wikipedia despite their levels of awards because no one starts by winning Grammys.The awards are notable and many respected Artist in that part of Africa have won it.Ramsey555 (talk) 21:47, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am glad to see that you have entered the debate at AfD. Be polite there, and not overly wordy, and not repetitive. In the end, one Administrator (not one of the people who have been participating in the AfD), will make a decision. My own opinion (I ma not an Admin) is that you have made a good faith effort to improve the article's content and referencing. This may be enough, or may be too soon in NazzKing's careeer. David notMD (talk) 15:38, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Teahouse. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 14:39, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nazz King for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nazz King is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nazz King until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bbarmadillo (talk) 16:45, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]