User talk:Random exploration

Welcome, you can speak to me!

February 2021[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock a user[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Random exploration (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked because of posting info repeatedly many times in single article but all infos are true,I won't do repeatedly this mistake. Thanks for reading, regards Random exploration (talk) 13:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

That is not why you were blocked. 331dot (talk) 10:03, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to modify or remove a declined unblock request for your currently active block. Do not do so again. You are welcome to make a new request, however. --Yamla (talk) 17:35, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask...[edit]

@TonyBallioni: Can I ask you the exact reason of blocking me? Random exploration (talk) 08:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Random exploration (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Admin gave sockpuppetry as reason but I have done nothing like that, even you can check with tools and please share what you got

Decline reason:

It may seem a little contrary to the usual principle that you get to see what the evidence is, but we grant that request so rarely that we get offended when people ask. I mean, you really think we'd give the many determined sockpuppeteers out there what they might need to game it better? Does the World Series of Poker post a list of the first cards to be dealt? It'd have the same utility. And then we'd get people saying, well, that's not me, that's someone in my building who just happens to share the same obsession with some forgotten conflict and a propensity for the same unusual spelling errors. How would we be able to see if that person was lying? So no, we're not unblocking. — Daniel Case (talk) 05:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Random exploration (talk) 19:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Random exploration (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Seriously, how admins identify vandalism, I edited article and even started giving citations which even others have not given but blocked me as sockpuppeteer ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Decline reason:

I trust Tony's judgement. Please appeal from your main account. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Random exploration (talk) 10:51, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]