User talk:Randomperson7893457

Welcome[edit]

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Gilly2005, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains^(talk) 20:41, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020[edit]

Hey! I’m Doggy54321. I see that you have made some requests to have the Ariana Grande page fully protected. I don’t know if you know this, but fully protected means only admins can edit the page. The two people who were edit warring have been blocked, one for 24h and one for a week. I don’t think such extreme measures need to be taken, as the vandal is blocked. Thanks! Doggy54321 (talk) 12:09, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, yes I just wanted to make sure no one else vandalized the page, but if the 2 vandals have been blocked for now I guess it's fine Randomperson7893457 (talk) 13:06, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you! If you could please withdraw your requests, that would be awesome! Thanks! Doggy54321 (talk) 13:08, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will regard this request as withdrawn unless I hear otherwise. Best! Andrewa (talk) 16:35, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Bovineboy2008. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sing 2, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BOVINEBOY2008 01:18, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Disney Channel original films. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not ignore sourced content – the sources used clearly show that that movie did not draw "8.1 million viewers" but considerably less than that. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:55, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of GamerGirl for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GamerGirl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GamerGirl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 10:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of GamerGirl[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on GamerGirl, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JayJay^{What did I do?} 20:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Raven-Symoné Filmography[edit]

Hello, Randomperson7893457. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Raven-Symoné Filmography, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 18:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Hulatam. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Doja Cat, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Hulatam (talk) 18:18, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

per the criteria at Template:Infobox musical artist#associated_acts, the associated acts field is for professional relationships with other musicians or bands that are significant and notable to this artist's career. Then, it proceeds to give examples as to what is appropriate. One of the bullet points is Acts with which this act has collaborated on multiple occasions, or on an album, or toured with as a single collaboration act playing together. I think the thing that’s holding us all up is "multiple". According to Google dictionary, multiple means several, and several means "more than two but not many". Randomperson7893457 (talk) 18:23, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Therefore I don't see why Grande should be added or needs to be added Randomperson7893457 (talk) 18:24, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Raven-Symoné Filmography[edit]

Hello, Randomperson7893457. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Raven-Symoné Filmography".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:31, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]