User talk:Rao Asghar

Rao Asghar, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Rao Asghar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 02:14, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Spellings

Please can you revert all of your recent changes to articles. You are changing the spelling of Rajput to Rajpoot despite consensus and comon usage favouring the former. Wikipedia operates on the basis of consensus within the community and also on common practice as demonstrated by, for example, our common name guidelines. If you wish to make the change to an archaic spelling then you will need to test the reaction by opening one or more discussions. Given the wide usage of "Rajput", you may find it best to float such an idea at the talk page of our India Project.

In addition, you have been inserting non-English spellings that use Indic scripts. These, too, are contrary to consensus and details relating to this can be found at User:Sitush/Common#Scripts. You need to remove all of those also. Sorry, but that is how it is. - Sitush (talk) 09:37, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Oh, and I notice also that you are overlinking terms. We usually only link to a word on its first occurrence in an article, not every time it appears. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 09:41, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

I am sorry but you seem not to be listening to sound advice. Please, stop what you are doing and revert your recent contributions to numerous articles. If you need more explanation then leave a note here and I will see it. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 09:59, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

You really, really should stop. If you continue to ignore consensus then you could be blocked from contributing here. One of the major problems with Indic scripts (and placenames in Pakistan generally were historically used pre-partition) is that there is fighting with regard to whether we should show Hindi, Urdu,. Nastaliq etc and, indeed, your edits demonstrate this attitude quite frequently. Best to leave alone, honestly. - Sitush (talk) 11:25, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Kheechee/Khichi

Hm. If you are sure that Kheechee is an alternate spelling for Khichi then the Kheechee article should be redirected to the more-complete Khichi title. Do you have any sources to support your statement that they are synonymous? - Sitush (talk) 09:50, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

I have reverted you here. We have a system: you either stick to it or open a discussion. - Sitush (talk) 10:24, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012

Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mianwali District, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I've removed it for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 18:52, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Notak, without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 18:54, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Given the many warnings you have been given for your continued nonconstructive editing, please take this as your final warning. If someone reverts your edits and explains on your talk page why they did it, Do not just undo their revert without discussion. King of Nothing (talk) 04:44, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Rao Asghar, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. King of Nothing (talk) 06:32, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Reverted again

I am getting very fed up of reverting your poor edits and it seems that other people are also. Furthermore, you seem to be incapable of communicating here or elsewhere. I suggest that you either start talking and stop adding poor content etc, or else I'll seek to have you blocked from editing for disruption within the next few hours. Please note the sanctions that are place for articles concerning India and Pakistan. - Sitush (talk) 19:27, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Yes

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

Special:Contributions/182.177.158.119 is currently contributing to articles that you have recently edited and is very similar in their actions. Most notably, this can be seen at Ranghar. Have you forgotten to log in? Just in case, please understand that editing while logged out is not a way to avoid scrutiny. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 05:04, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for repeatedly introducing unsourced information, changing sourced information without reason, changing of spellings, addition of indic scripts in violation of WP:INDICSCRIPT, and, most importantly, never discussing your changes with anyone. Wikipedia is a collaborative editing environment. People have to work together, and when people bring concerns to you about your edits, you have to respond to them; you definitely cannot edit war to try to force your preferred version into articles. Please look at the concerns people are raising with your here, and, after you're unblocked, start to discuss them. If you resume edit warring, you'll be reblocked, for longer.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:18, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing, as outlined in the previous block summary. You have returned to the same pattern of editing that led to your previous block. If you wish to start editing constructively, you can appeal as outlined above. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 13:49, 8 December 2012 (UTC)