Jump to content

User talk:Ratio10to1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Ratio10to1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! The Bushranger One ping only 21:57, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ratio10to1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

have not disrupted Wikipedia, have done no shill voting ... my accuser claims I added an article written by another account ( they have zero in common). I can't see my article but anyone there who has access, can see there is no similarity Ratio10to1 (talk) 23:23, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below after review of deleted article. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:06, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Comment on re-created article from blocked user[edit]

In the above, Ratio10to1 claims that there is "zero in common" and "no similarity" between the article he re-created and previous versions. This is false. There was lots of obvious, verbatim overlap. Logical Cowboy (talk) 00:30, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]