Jump to content

User talk:Ravdag

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Ravdag, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Solar man, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Skamecrazy123 (talk) 17:49, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Solar man has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unencyclopedic Content - No notable sources found

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 17:49, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Solar man for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Solar man is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solar man until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 06:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:47, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Solar_man, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. I, Jethrobot drop me a line 22:40, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Solar Man deletion discussion

[edit]

I have responded to your points. Please review Wikipedia policy, and understand that making arguments for your article that do not cite policy are not likely to be strong arguments. I, Jethrobot drop me a line 22:42, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Privacy concerns

[edit]

I have asked an admin about the privacy concerns you had, and was told that, as the information was posted on a public site, there was no privacy concern. Even if there was, it has become apparent that the page has been deleted, so there is nothing to be concerned about. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 21:47, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]